Table 5. Top models (cumulative weight >0.95) and beta coefficients for predicting household compensation distribution around Kanha National Park.
| Models | 26 | 27 | 28 | 30 | 29 | 11 | 31 | 6 |
| wi = 0.37 | wi = 0.31 | wi = 0.10 | wi = 0.08 | wi = 0.06 | wi = 0.04 | wi = 0.03 | wi = 0.01 | |
| Intercept | −2.93 (0.19) | −2.99 (0.20) | −2.95 (0.19) | −3.00 (0.20) | −2.93 (0.19) | −2.87 (0.18) | −2.97 (0.20) | −2.93 (0.19) |
| Crop-raiding reported to authorities | 0.52 (0.38) | 0.58 (0.38) | 0.58 (0.38) | 0.50 (0.38) | 0.48 (0.39) | 0.66 (0.37) | 0.50 (0.39) | 0.74 (0.37) |
| Livestock-predation reported to authorities | 1.44 (0.44) | 1.49 (0.45) | 1.53 (0.45) | 1.47 (0.46) | 1.42 (0.44) | 1.63 (0.43) | 1.51 (0.46) | 1.67 (0.45) |
| Wild pig | −0.83 (0.41) | −0.79 (0.41) | −0.74 (0.41) | −0.76 (0.42) | −0.83 (0.41) | −0.75 (0.40) | −0.71 (0.42) | −0.69 (0.40) |
| Chital | −0.05 (0.34) | −0.14 (0.35) | −0.08 (0.35) | −0.11 (0.35) | −0.03 (0.34) | −0.07 (0.34) | −0.05 (0.35) | −0.14 (0.35) |
| Tiger | 1.42 (0.40) | 1.44 (0.41) | 1.37 (0.41) | 1.4 (0.42) | 1.40 (0.40) | 1.49 (0.41) | 1.33 (0.42) | 1.50 (0.42) |
| Leopard | −0.08 (0.40) | 0.05 (0.41) | 0.09 (0.41) | 0.05 (0.42) | −0.07 (0.4) | −0.13 (0.39) | 0.10 (0.42) | −0.002 (0.41) |
| Langur | NA | −0.61 (0.43) | −0.36 (0.40) | −0.74 (0.45) | NA | NA | −0.51 (0.43) | −0.65 (0.43) |
| Wolf | NA | −0.42 (0.48) | −0.46 (0.48) | −0.51 (0.50) | NA | NA | −0.55 (0.50) | −0.47 (0.48) |
| Jackal | NA | −0.28 (0.45) | −0.19 (0.45) | −0.31 (0.46) | NA | NA | −0.23 (0.46) | −0.12 (0.44) |
| Bonnet macaque | NA | 1.00 (0.47) | NA | 0.98 (0.48) | NA | NA | NA | 0.78 (0.46) |
| Human injury reported to authorities | NA | NA | NA | 0.66 (0.56) | 0.41 (0.53) | NA | 0.68 (0.57) | NA |
| Human death reported to authorities | NA | NA | NA | 0.24 (0.89) | −0.19 (0.85) | NA | 0.37 (0.90) | NA |
| Household located inside buffer | 0.83 (0.32) | 0.95 (0.33) | 0.84 (0.32) | 0.96 (0.33) | 0.84 (0.32) | NA | 0.86 (0.32) | NA |
| Model AIC | 346.33 | 346.69 | 348.91 | 349.34 | 349.85 | 350.88 | 351.23 | 352.79 |
| Δ AIC | 0 | 0.36 | 2.58 | 3.01 | 3.52 | 4.54 | 4.89 | 6.46 |
†
Note: Standard errors in brackets and top-ranked models are shown, wi is the AIC model weight ΔAICc is the difference in values between lowest AIC model and each model.