Table 8.
Functional connectivity between regions of interest during three task conditions at week one.
| Task | Areaa | MFC | LNAcc | RNAcc | LHIP | RHIP |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rest dF = 16 | MFC | 1.000 | ||||
| LNAcc | 0.517 p = 0.028* | 1.000 | ||||
| RNAcc | −0.013 p = 0.959 | 0.265 p = 0.288 | 1.000 | |||
| LHIP | 0.137 p = 0.589 | 0.428 p = 0.077 | −0.047 p = 0.852 | 1.000 | ||
| RHIP | −0.032 p = 0.900 | −0.093 p = 0.713 | −0.395 p = 0.105 | 0.611 p = 0.007* | 1.000 | |
| Sensorimotor control task dF = 14 | MFC | 1.000 | ||||
| LNAcc | 0.447 p = 0.083 | 1.000 | ||||
| RNAcc | 0.092 p = 0.736 | 0.262 p = 0.326 | 1.000 | |||
| LHIP | 0.461 p = 0.072 | 0.210 p = 0.436 | −0.219 p = 0.415 | 1.000 | ||
| RHIP | 0.152 p = 0.575 | 0.141 p = 0.604 | −0.425 p = 0.101 | 0.823 p = 0.000** | 1.000 | |
| Decision task dF = 15 | MFC | 1.000 | ||||
| LNAcc | 0.719 p = 0.001** | 1.000 | ||||
| RNAcc | 0. 038 p = 0.885 | 0.253 p = 0.326 | 1.000 | |||
| LHIP | 0. 385 p = 0.127 | 0.470 p = 0.057 | −0.245 p = 0.343 | 1.000 | ||
| RHIP | 0.045 p = 0.862 | 0.280 p = 0.277 | −0.400 p = 0.112 | 0.714 p = 0.001** | 1.000 |
aValues reported are Pearson’s r and two-tailed significance. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.005.
PFC, prefrontal cortex; LNAcc, left nucleus accumbens, RNAcc, right nucleus accumbens; LHIP, left hippocampus; RHIP, right hippocampus; dF, degrees of freedom.