Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Dec 6.
Published in final edited form as: Med J Zambia. 2010;37(2):104–110.

Table 3.

Studies of bloodstream infections in patients with fever

Patients Positive
Culture
TB NTBM NTS SP GN SA
n (%) n (%) n (% of positive cultures by HIV status)
Malawi

  Peters, et al15 2 9 1
      HIV+ 291 (83) 118 (41) 55(47) 44 (37) 13 (11)
      HIV−   61 (17)   10 (16)   2 (20)   2 (20)   3 (30)

  Archibald16
      HIV+ 173 (74)   62 (36) 20 (32) 4(6) 12 (19) 21(34) 4 (6) 0
      HIV−   60 (26)   8 (13)   0 0   1 (13)   4(50) 2 (25) 0

Tanzania

  Archibald17
      HIV+ 282 (55) 118 (42) 57 (48) 0 23(19) 6 (5) 14(12) 5 (4)
      HIV− 235 (45) 27 (11) 3   (11) 1 (3)   7 (26) 5 (19)  8 (30) 8 (30)

Uganda

  Jacobs, et al1^ 381 72(19) 25** 30** 20 6 5 12
      HIV+ 320 (85)*
      HIV−   57 (15)

  Ssali, et al18
      HIV+ 227 (76) 61 (27) 28 (46) 2 (3) 13 (21) 11(18) 5 (8) 0
      HIV−   72 (24) 11 (15)   0 0 0   4(36) 3 (27) 2 (18)

CN – Cryptococcus neoformans; GN – gram negative bacteriae other than salmonella; NTBM – Nontuberculous mycobacteria; NTS – nontyphoid salmonella species; SA – Staphylococcus aureus; SP – Streptococcus pneumonia; TB – Mycobacteria tuberculosis

Results not available by HIV status

All salmonella species, including typhi

^

Indication for culturing was sepsis. Only 58% of pts had fever on admission.

*

only 377 patients tested for HIV

**

out of 249 pts tested for mycobacterial blood cultures