Table 4.
Jsm | Jms | Jnet | Ieq | RT | VT | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Control 25 HCO3− | 0.85 ± 0.10 | 0.77 ± 0.16 | 0.08 ± 0.10 | 0.78 ± 0.11 | 364 ± 23 | −7.61 ± 0.61 |
Forskolin 25 HCO3− | 1.75 ± 0.18*** | 1.60 ± 0.18*** | 0.15 ± 0.17 | 2.70 ± 0.14*** | 266 ± 14*** | −19.26 ± 0.63*** |
Forskolin 30 HCO3− | 1.53 ± 0.12++ | 1.27 ± 0.10+++ | 0.25 ± 0.11++ | 2.71 ± 0.12 | 262 ± 16 | −19.03 ± 0.74 |
Forskolin 50 HCO3− | 2.77 ± 0.15††† | 2.50 ± 0.10††† | 0.27 ± 0.13 | 2.75 ± 0.14 | 254 ± 20 | −18.73 ± 0.56 |
Monolayers were bathed with symmetrical 25 m HCO3−, then with 30 or 50 mmol l−1 HCO3− on the apical side; 10 μmol l−1 forskolin was added to both sides. Jsm, Jms, Jnet, Ieq: μeq cm−2 h−1; Rt: ohms cm2 h−1. Values are mean ± SEM. ***P < 0.001, forskolin (25 HCO3−) vs. control. ++, +++, P < 0.01, P < 0.001, forskolin (30 HCO3−) vs. forskolin (25 HCO3−). †††P < 0.001, forskolin (50 HCO3−) vs. forskolin (30 HCO3−), control and forskolin (25 HCO3−) (n= 8 each) and forskolin (30 HCO3−) and forskolin (50 HCO3−) (n= 4 each).