Skip to main content
. 2012 Nov 28;2012:812609. doi: 10.1155/2012/812609

Table 3.

Characteristics of populations and interventions in the randomised controlled trials assessing clinical outcomes with the use of biocompatible fluids in PD.

Study ID [reference] Interventions No. of patients  Study design Outcome Followup
(incident/prevalent) (parallel/crossover) 
(no. of centres)
RRF PSTR UF Peritonitis
Neutral pH, lactate-buffered, low-GDP versus acidic pH, lactate-buffered, high-GDP fluids

Bajo et al. [30] Balance versus Stay-safe 33 (I) Parallel (2) 24 months
Johnson et al. [44] Balance versus Stay-safe 185 (I) Parallel (16) 24 months
Kim et al. [36] Balance versus Stay-safe 91 (I) Parallel (4) 12 months
Kim et al. [45] Balance versus Stay-safe 26 (I) Parallel (2) NA NA 12 months
Szeto et al. [40] Balance versus Stay-safe 50 (I) Parallel (1) NA 12 months
Williams et al. [43] Balance versus Stay-safe 86 (P) Crossover (22) 24 weeks
Choi et al. [31] Balance versus Conventional (Dianeal, Stay-safe) 104 (P) Parallel (1) NA 12 months
Haag-Weber et al. [34] Gambrosol Trio versus Gambrosol 69 (I + P) Parallel (5) 18 months
Rippe et al. [39] Gambrosol Trio versus Gambrosol 21 (I + P) Parallel (9) NA 24 months
Lai et al. [37] Biocompatible (Balance, Gambrosol Trio, Physioneal) versus Conventional (Dianeal, ANDY-Disc) 125 (I) Parallel (4) NA 2.3 years
Fan et al. [32] Biocompatible (Balance or Physioneal) versus Conventional (Stay-safe or Dianeal) 118 (I) Parallel (1) 12 months
Srivastava et al. [50] Biocompatible (Balance or Physioneal) versus Conventional (Stay-safe or Dianeal) 267 (I) Parallel (1) NA NA NA ~2.3 years

Neutral pH, bicarbonate (±lactate)-buffered, low-GDP versus acidic pH, lactate-buffered, high-GDP fluids

Fischback et al. [65] Physioneal (25 mmol/L bicarbonate/15 mmol/L lactate) versus Dianeal 6 (P) Cross-over (2) NA NA 2 days
Fusshoeller et al. [17] Physioneal (25 mmol/L bicarbonate/15 mmol/L lactate) versus Dianeal 14 (P) Cross-over (1) NA NA NA NA 12 months
John et al. [66] Physioneal (25 mmol/L bicarbonate/15 mmol/L lactate) versus Dianeal 10 (P) Cross-over (1) NA NA NA 2 days
Pajek et al. [38] Physioneal (25 mmol/L bicarbonate/15 mmol/L lactate) versus Dianeal 21 (P) Cross-over (1) NA 6 months
Parikova et al. [48] Physioneal (25 mmol/L bicarbonate/15 mmol/L lactate) versus Dianeal 10 (P) Cross-over (1) NA NA 2 days
Tranaeus [41] 25 mmol/L bicarbonate/15 mmol/L lactate PD fluid versus 40 mmol/L lactate-buffered PD fluid 106 (P) Parallel (17) 12 months
Fang et al. [67] Physioneal (25 mmol/L bicarbonate/15 mmol/L lactate) versus Dianeal 18 (P) Cross-over (1) NA NA NA 2 days
Mactier et al. [14] Bicarbonate/lactate (25/15 mmol/L) versus bicarbonate (38 mmol/L) versus lactate (40 mmol/L) 18 (P) Cross-over (8) NA NA NA NA 3 days
Coles et al. [68] Bicarbonate/lactate (25/15 mmol/L) versus bicarbonate (38 mmol/L) versus lactate (40 mmol/L) 59 (P) Parallel (5) NA NA 2 months
Feriani et al. [47] Bicavera (bicarbonate 34 mmol/L) versus lactate (35 mmol/L) 123 (P) Parallel (14) NA NA 24 weeks
Haas et al. [35] Bicavera (bicarbonate 34 mmol/L) versus lactate (35 mmol/L) 28 (P) Cross-over (6) 6 months
Fernandez-Perpén et al. [33] Bicavera (bicarbonate 34 mmol/L) versus lactate (35 mmol/L) 31 (I) Parallel (2) 24 months
Weiss et al. [42] Bicarbonate (bicarbonate 34 mmol/L) versus lactate (35 mmol/L) 53 (P) Cross-over (13) NA 6 months

Glucose sparing (NEPP) versus acidic pH, lactate-buffered, high-GDP fluids

Lui [46] Physioneal (25 mmol/L bicarbonate/15 mmol/L lactate), Extraneal (7.5% icodextrin), Nutrineal (1.1% amino acid) versus Dianeal 150 (I) Parallel (8)

RRF: residual renal function; PSTR: peritoneal solute transport rate; UF: ultrafiltration; NEPP: Nutrineal, Extraneal, Physioneal, and physioneal; ↓: decrease, ↑: increase; —: no change; N/A: not available.