Skip to main content
. 2012 Dec 5;87(6):1149–1151. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.2012.12-0287

Table 1.

Positivity to total HPV DNA, HR-HPV, LR-HPV, Ct, total HPV plus Ct, HR-HPV plus Ct, and LR-HPV plus Ct in Brazilian women with cervical abnormalities (N = 252) without considering the multiple HPV infection

Cervical cytology HPV positivity n (%) HPV plus Ct positivity n (%)
HPV HR-HPV LR-HPV HPV + Ct HR-HPV + Ct LR-HPV + Ct Ct
NILM (controls; N = 370) 28 (7.60) 14 (3.80) 13 (3.51) 4 (1.10) 1 (0.27) 3 (0.81) 36 (9.73)
AGC (N = 6) 2 (33.33) 2 (33.33)
ASC-US (N = 93) 37 (39.80)* 19 (20.43) 21 (22.60) 8 (8.60) 2 (2.15) 6 (6.45) 17 (18.30)
ASC-H (N = 38) 26 (68.42) 21 (55.30) 5 (13.16) 6 (15.80) 5 (13.16) 1 (2.63) 7 (18.42)
LSIL (N = 55) 42 (76.40) 30 (54.55)§ 12 (21.82) 8 (14.55) 6 (10.91) 3 (5.45) 9 (16.40)
HSIL (N = 42) 42 (100.0) 36 (85.71) 11 (26.20) 7 (16.70) 7 (16.70) 1 (2.40) 7 (16.70)
CC (N = 18) 18 (100.0) 18 (100.0) 6 (33.33) 3 (16.70) 3 (16.70) 2 (11.11) 3 (16.70)
Total (N = 622) 195 (31.35) 140 (22.51) 68 (10.93) 36 (5.80) 24 (3.86) 16 (2.60) 79 (12.70)

P value < 0.05 is considered significant. Cytology findings: controls (NILM; N = 370); cases: AGCs (N = 6), ASC-US (N = 93), ASC-H (N = 38), LSIL (N = 55), HSIL (N = 42), and CC (N = 18).

*

P = 0.0053; P value compared HPV infection with ASC-US.

P = 0.0001; P value compared HPV infection with ASC-H, LSIL, HSIL, and CC and compared HR-HPV with HSIL and CC.

P = 0.0037; P value compared HR-HPV infection with ASC-H.

§

P= 0.0025; P value compared HR-HPV infection with LSIL.