Skip to main content
. 2012 Dec 5;87(6):1149–1151. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.2012.12-0287

Table 2.

HPV genotypes detected in all women studied including with normal cytology (controls), with cervical abnormalities (cases) and also with Chlamydia trachomatis (Ct) without considered HPV multiple infections

HPV genotypes NILM (n = 370) Cervical abnormalities (n = 252) *P value Ct (n = 79) **P value
n % n % n %
HR-HPV
16 5 50.0 62 46.9 0.99 13 59.1 0.99
51 7 5.3 1 4.5
45 1 10.0 8 6.1 0.84 4 18.2 0.80
18 1 10.0 7 5.3 0.81
82 6 4.5 2 9.1
31 2 20.0 10 7.7 0.60 2 9.1 0.78
59 1 10.0 7 5.3 0.81
35 6 4.5
33 8 6.1
66 6 4.5
52 3 2.3
68 2 1.5
Total 10 100.0 132 100.0 0.99 22 100.0 0.99
LR-HPV
72 1 12.5 23 36.5 0.50 6 40.0 0.50
42 6 9.5 1 6.7
61 2 25.0 1 1.5 0.55 1 6.7 0.67
69 1 12.5 3 4.8 0.77 1 6.7 0.86
81 2 25.0 4 6.3 0.57
67 2 25.0 1 1.5 0.55 1 6.7 0.66
53 2 3.2 2 13.3
40 1 1.5 1 6.7
11 3 4.8 2 13.3
Others1 20
Total 8 100.0 63 100.0 0.99 15 100.0 0.99

P value < 0.05 is considered significant.

Cytology findings: controls (normal –NILM) cases: atypical glandular cells, atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance or -cannot exclude high-grade squamous intraepithelial cervical lesion, low-grade or high-grade squamous intraepithelial cervical lesion, and squamous cervical carcinoma. HPV = HPV positive; HR-HPV = high-risk HPV; LR-HPV = low-risk HPV; Ct = Chlamydia trachomatis positive; Others1 = 6, 13, 39, 54, 58, 62 and 70.

*

P value compared normal cytology versus cervical abnormalities.

**

P value compared Chlamydia detection versus HPV genotypes.