Table 2.
COI sequence analyses for Anopheles triannulatus s.l. from northwestern and southeastern Colombia
| Department (state) locality (abbreviation) | Haplotype designation (frequency) | COI sequences analyzed | Genetic polymorphisms | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S | H | h (SD) | π (SD) | |||
| Antioquia | ||||||
| El Bagre (BAG) | A(2), B(2), C(7), D(7), E(2), G(2), N(1), O(3), P(2), Q(2), R(2), S(2), T(2), CC(1), DD(1) | 51 | 35 | 32 | 0.950 ± 0.015 | 0.0438 ± 0.0240 |
| Zaragoza (ZAR)* | A(2), C(1), D(2), E(1), G(2), DD(1) | 11* | NA | NA | NA | NA |
| San Pedro de Urabá (SPU) | B(3), C(2), E(1), H(2), K(1), N(1), Y(2), Z(2), AA(2), BB(1), CC(1) | 31 | 71 | 23 | 0.987 ± 0.013 | 0.0698 ± 0.0373 |
| Córdoba | ||||||
| Puerto Libertador (PLT) | A(10), B(8), E(4), H(2), I(4), J(3), K(2), L(3), M(3), N(1), U(2), V(2), W(2), X(2), BB(1) | 62 | 31 | 29 | 0.947 ± 0.015 | 0.0488 ± 0.0265 |
| Total northwestern | A(14), B(13), C(10), D(9), E(8), F(6)†, G(5), H(4), I(4), J(3), K(3), L(3), M(3), N(3), O(3), P(2), Q(2), R(2), S(2), T(2), U(2), V(2), W(2), X(2), Y(2), Z(2), AA(2), BB(2), CC(2), DD(2) | 155 | 95 | 67 | 0.972 ± 0.005 | 0.0513 ± 0.0274 |
| Amazonas | ||||||
| Leticia (LET) | EE(8), FF(3), GG(1), HH(3), II(4), JJ(2), KK(1), LL(2), MM(2), NN(1), OO(1), PP(1)-RR(1), SS(1), VV(1) | 55 | 93 | 37 | 0.970 ± 0.013 | 0.0476 ± 0.0259 |
| Puerto Nariño (PNA) | EE(2), FF(6), GG(4), II(1), JJ(1), KK(1), LL(1), MM(1), OO(1), SS(1), TT(2), UU(2), VV(1) | 42 | 34 | 30 | 0.970 ± 0.015 | 0.0395 ± 0.0221 |
| Tarapacá1 (TAR) | EE(3), FF(2), GG(2), HH(2), JJ(1), KK(2), NN(1), PP(1), QQ(1)-RR(1) | 34 | 52 | 28 | 0.990 ± 0.001 | 0.0694 ± 0.0340 |
| Total southeastern | EE(13), FF(11), GG(7), HH(5), II(5), JJ(4), KK(4), LL(3), MM(3), NN(2), OO(2), PP(2), QQ(2)-RR(2), SS(2), TT(2), UU(2), VV(2) | 131 | 116 | 74 | 0.976 ± 0.006 | 0.0518 ± 0.0277 |
*
ZAR COI sequences (11) were analyzed together with those from BAG.
†
Haplotypes corresponding to specimens from Santa Rosa de Lima (SRL) in Bolivar were not included in the genetic diversity analyses caused by the low number of specimens available.
S = number of segregating sites, H = haplotype number, h = haplotype diversity, π = nucleotide diversity; NA = not apply.