Skip to main content
. 2013 Jan;74(1):104–113. doi: 10.15288/jsad.2013.74.104

Table 2.

Summary of logistic regression analysis for variables predicting younger siblings’ cigarette use (n = 322)

Model 1
Model 2
Variable B OR [95% CI] B OR [95% CI]
Intercept −2 72*** −2.90***
Family structure 1.05** 2.87 [1.36,6.04] 1.10** 2.99 [1.40,6.37]
Parental knowledge −0.97** 0.38 [0.18,0.79] −0.99** 0.37 [0.18,0.78]
Sibling intimacy 0.29 1.34 [0.58,3.10] 0.29 1.34 [0.57,3.18]
Sibling conflict −0.02 0.98 [0.54, 1.76] 0.01 1.01 [0.56, 1.82]
Parent’s cigarette use 0.47 1.60 [0.64, 4.03] 0.36 1.43 [0.55, 3.70]
Friends’ cigarette use 0.80*** 2.22 [1.67,2.94] 0.82*** 2.26 [1.69,3.03]
Sibling’s cigarette use (sib. cig.) 0.73 2.08 [0.98, 4.40] 0.84* 2.31 [1.04,5.17]
Shared friends (shr. fr.) −0.45 0.64 [0.39, 1.05] −0.63 0.54 [0.27, 1.06]
Sibling modeling (mod.) −0.16 0.85 [0.46, 1.59] 0.36 1.44 [0.60, 3.43]
Sib. Cig. × Mod. −0.68 0.51 [0.17, 1.50]
Sib Cig × Shr. Fr. 0.37 1.45 [0.54, 3.88]
Mod. × Shr. Fr. 0.64* 1.89 [1.04,3.42]
χ2 74.27 79.27
df 13 16

Notes: Nonsignificant controls omitted from table: parental education, sex composition, age spacing, and gender. OR = odds ratio.

*

p < .05;

**

p < .01;

***

p < .001.