Skip to main content
. 2012 May 20;12:184. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-12-184

Table 2.

Table of characteristics of included quantitative studies of patients’ perceptions and caregivers’ attitudes

Study Design (Level of evidence) Participants Study factors/Patient groups Outcomes Comments and quality
LoConte 2008: Else-Quest 2009, Wisconsin USA
Cohort
NSCLC, breast or prostate cancer
Lung cancer (N = 96) vs breast cancer
Guilt and shame (SSGS)
Primary endpoint = SSGS
Mailed patient self report survey (Level IV as only cross-sectional baseline data were relevant)
Stage IV
(N = 30) or prostate cancer
Perceived cancer related stigma
Target sample size lung cancer
Fluent and able to complete survey in English
(N = 46)
Perceived stigma
N = 94, breast cancer N = 47, prostate cancer N = 47 to detect anticipated difference of > 0.75 points in mean SSGS scores with 80% power for a 2-sided significance level of 0.05
Recruited from 3 oncology clinics
Study closed prematurely because of poor accrual among breast cancer patients
Mean age, years (SD)
Lung cancer = 65.6 (11)
Breast cancer = 61.8 (9.8)
Prostate cancer = 72.9 (9.2)
200/237 recruited
172/200 (86%) completed at least 1 questionnaire
Cross sectional
Study quality
Mailed patient self report survey (Level IV)
Lung cancer patients
Current or former smokers (N = 88) vs never smokers
Guilt and shame
Subject selection 0
(n = 96)
(N = 8)
Perceived cancer
Group comparability 0
49% women
Perceived stigma
related stigma
Participation rate 0
Guilt and shame
Anxiety
Anger
Depression
Self esteem
Cataldo 2011, USA
Cross sectional
Lung cancer all types and stages
Lung cancer stigma
Depression
Outcomes used to validate lung cancer stigma scale
Patient self report online survey (Level IV)
Convenience sample
Self esteem
Recruited via websites frequented by potential study participants
Social support
70% female
Social conflict
Study quality
21% never smoked
Quality of life
Subject selection 0
Mean age, years (SD) = 55 (13.7)
Group comparability NA
186/200 completed all stigma items
Participation rate 0
Devitt 2010, Victoria, Australia
Cross sectional
 
Shame about lung cancer as a potential barrier to participating in a support group
 
12% of participants reported attending a face-to-face support group
Patient self report survey (Level IV)
Lung cancer (74% NSCLC, 16% SCLC, 5% mesothelioma, 5% presumed lung cancer)
53% of participants indicated they would be likely or very likely to attend a support group for lung cancer patients
42% Stage IV
Also surveyed support group facilitators
Able to complete survey in English
 
Consecutive lung cancer patients attending multidisciplinary outpatient clinics at a cancer centre subsequent to initial consultation
Study quality
Excluded those with cognitive impairment or ECOG performance status > 2
Subject selection 0
12% current smokers
Group comparability NA
Median age, years = 68
Participation rate 0
42% female
Response rate = 101/172 (59%)
Lobchuk 2008b, Canada
Cross sectional
Primary caregivers of lung cancer patients (76% NSCLC)
Primary caregiver blame re patient’s efforts to control the disease
Primary caregiver assistance in coping with lung cancer and its symptoms
 
Preliminary sample
58% diagnosed with advanced disease
Study quality
Primary caregiver self report survey (Level IV)
Able to speak, read and write in English and cognitively competent
Subject selection 0
Convenience sample recruited from 5 outpatient cancer clinics
Group comparability 0
Patients
current (N = 25) vs former (N = 66) vs never (N = 9) smokers
Primary caregiver blame re patient’s efforts to control the disease
Participation rate 0
9% never smokers
Mean age, years (SD) = 64 (8.0)
62% female
Response rate = 100/350 (29%)
Siminoff 2010, USA, Ohio Cross sectional
Lung cancer patients with a primary caregiver
Family blames the cancer on the patient for not taking better care of themselves
Patient depression  
Patient and their primary caregiver semi- structured interview, (Level IV) Stage III or IV NSCLC
Patient and caregiver perceptions Study quality
Recruited from a comprehensive cancer centre and its community affiliates – identified by their physicians
Subject selection 0
92% smokers
Group comparability 1
Mean age, years (SD) = 65 (9.7)
(adjusted for age and sex)
45% female
Participation rate 0
Response rate = 76%
N = 190 patients + caregivers

ECOG = Eastern Co-operative Oncology Group; NSCLC = Non small cell lung cancer; SCLC = Small cell lung cancer; SSGS = State Shame and Guilt Scale; NA = Not applicable (only within individual correlations were reported so comparability of groups was not assessed).