Skip to main content
. 2012 Oct 29;14(5):e134. doi: 10.2196/jmir.2052

Table 4.

Cost effectiveness analysis of base case, health care provider perspective, and additional sensitivity analyses.

Cost drivers Base
case:
societal
Alternative
case:
health care
provider
Sensitivity analyses
Ia –40% I +40% Pb –40% P +40% I and P
–40%
I and P
+40%
Incremental costs (median) 845 271 739 954 681 1012 573 1120
Treatment response
Incremental effects (median) 0.24 0.24 0.24 0.24 0.24 0.24 0.24 0.24
ICERc (median) 3683 1157 3187 4172 2977 4387 2494 4868
ICER (95%low) –5703 665 –6441 –5050 –3227 –8313 –3821 –7576
ICER (95%high) 20,366 3722 19,410 21,409 14,724 25,979 13,738 26,957
WTPd €4000 53% 95% 57% 50% 62% 48% 66% 46%
WTP €8000 76% 98% 78% 74% 85% 69% 87% 67%
WTP €12,000 87% 99% 89% 86% 92% 82% 93% 80%
Upper right quadrant 79% 99% 76% 82% 83% 76% 79% 79%
Upper left (inferior) quadrant 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1%
Lower left quadrant 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
Lower right (dominant) quadrant 20% 0% 23% 17% 16% 22% 20% 20%
QALYse
Incremental QALYs (median) 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06
ICER QALY (median) 14,710 4693 12,932 16,584 11,876 17,683 9946 19,436
ICER QALY (95%low) –18,337 2783 –20,177 –16,241 –10,291 –26,220 –12,282 –24,352
ICER QALY (95%high) 71,664 10,848 67,913 75,671 52,202 91,101 48,403 94,958
WTP €10,000 40% 95% 45% 36% 44% 38% 50% 35%
WTP €20,000 60% 99% 64% 57% 70% 54% 74% 51%
WTP €40,000 85% 100% 87% 83% 93% 77% 94% 74%
Upper right quadrant 80% 100% 76% 83% 84% 77% 80% 80%
Upper left (inferior) quadrant 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
Lower left quadrant 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
Lower right (dominant) quadrant 20% 0% 23% 17% 16% 23% 20% 20%

a Intervention costs.

b Productivity costs.

c Incremental cost effectiveness ratio.

d Willingness to pay.

e Quality-adjusted life-year.