Skip to main content
. 2012 Dec 7;7(12):e51194. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0051194

Table 1. Factors of HCV testing (GLM, Poisson) and factors of HCV positivity (logistic regression).

Screening per subpopulation Risk factors
Number of tests RR adjusteda (95%CI) Positives (%) OR adjusteda (95%CI)
Sex Male 13,062 1.18 (1.17–1.19)** 573 (4.4) 1.71 (1.46–2.00)**
Female 10,738 1.00 250 (2.3) 1.00
Age 18–25 2,055 1.00 21 (1.0) 1.00
26–35 4,182 1.69 (1.63–1.76)** 158 (3.8) 4.08 (2.57–6.47)**
36–45 4,614 1.84 (1.77–1.90)** 354 (7.7) 8.95 (5.72–13.99)**
46–55 4,057 1.64 (1.58–1.70)** 217 (5.3) 6.40 (4.06–10.10)**
56–65 3,606 1.64 (1.58–1.69)* 47 (1.3) 1.75 (1.03–2.95)*
>65 5,286 2.84 (2.75–2.95)** 26 (0.5) 0.64 (0.36–1.14)
Care provider GP 4,470 1.00 160 (3.6) 1.00
Specialist 16,515 2.66 (2.61–2.72)** 390 (2.4) 0.90 (0.74–1.09)
Otherb 2,815 0.68 (0.65–0.71)** 273 (9.7) 3.13 (2.54–3.86)**
SES % on Low SES 13,338 2.24 (2.17–2.31)** 609 (4.6) 1.76 (1.33–2.29)**
social welfare Middle SES 5,705 1.11 (1.07–1.15)** 124 (2.2) 0.95 (0.70–1.27)
High SES 4,757 1.00 90 (1.9) 1.00
SES by property Low SES 12,664 2.53 (2.44–2.63)** 542 (4.3) 1.50 (1.11–2.04)**
value Middle SES 7,686 1.33 (1.28–1.38)** 218 (2.8) 1.37 (1.01–1.86)*
High SES 3,450 1.00 63 (1.8) 1.00

Laboratory surveillance data, South Limburg, the Netherlands, 2002–2008.

a

Adjusted for sex, age, care provider, test year, SES by percentage of people on social welfare, and SES by mean property value. * p<0.05 **p<0.01.

b

Non-hospital, non-GP test providers.

GP: general practitioner; HCV: hepatitis C virus; RR: Relative Risk; OR: Odds Ratio; SES: Socio-economic status.