Skip to main content
. 2012 Jun 15;12:249. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-12-249

Table 2.

Comparison of methylation of 7 miR CpG islands in 112 GC samples from patients with various clinicopathological characteristics

Clinicopathological features miR-9-1 methylation
miR-9-3 methylation
miR-137 methylation
miR-34b methylation
miR-200b methylation
miR-375 methylation
miR-210 methylation
Positive rate (%) Proportion, Median * [25-75%] Positive rate (%) Proportion, Median [25-75%] Positive rate (%) Proportion, Median [25-75%] Positive rate (%) Proportion, Median [25-75%] Positive rate (%) Proportion, Median [25-75%] Positive rate (%) Proportion, Median [25-75%] Positive rate (%) Proportion, Median [25-75%]
Age
≤60 (n = 49)
46.9a
21 [14–38]
68.8
35 [31–42]
95.9
34 [16–48]b
62.5
5 [2–16]
92.9
49 [43–55]
54.3
3 [2–14]
65.1
9 [5–27]
 
>60 (n = 63)
73.0
33 [18–44]
61.0
36 [30–44]
93.3
47 [29–61]
54.2
10 [3–23]
87.7
48 [40–56]
38.3
3 [2–14]
72.9
10 [5–17]
Sex
Male (n = 80)
61.2
31 [14–45]
62.7
35 [30–42]
96.1
40 [24–54]
53.8
7 [3–18]
88.4
48 [40–56]
44.6
3 [2–7]
69.9
9 [5–17]
 
Female (n = 32)
62.5
27 [17–36]
68.8
41 [30–43]
90.6
43 [18–54]
69.0
8 [2–26]
93.3
51 [46–55]
46.9
8 [2–19]
69.0
12 [5–22]
Preoperative chemotherapy
No (n = 100)
63.0
32 [16–44]
63.2
35 [30–43]
93.8
39 [23–56]
58.9
7 [3–18]
91.0
49 [41–56]
44.7
4 [2–16]
69.6
9 [5–19]
Yes (n = 9)
55.6
21 [12–31]
66.7
37 [31–54]
100
49 [30–53]
44.4
5 [2–16]
71.4
49 [42–76]
44.4
2 [2–4]
57.1
13 [10–24]
Location
Cardiac (n = 34)
64.7
37 [21–47]
65.6
43 [35–51]b
90.9
49 [28–61]b
57.6
8 [3–23]
75.0d
43 [38–52]
31.2
3 [1–8]
64.5
9 [4–17]
 
Non-cardiac (n = 78)
60.3
28 [14–42]
64.0
34 [30–42]
96.1
38 [20–52]
58.1
6 [3–18]
97.0
50 [42–56]
51.4
3 [2–16]
71.8
10 [5–21]
Differentiation
Well/Mod. (n = 29)
72.4a
27 [9–44]
69.0
37 [30–50]
86.2
45 [31–53]
44.4
9 [3–16]
84.6
53 [42–58]
40.7
3 [2–4]
73.1
9 [4–17]
 
Poor (n = 78)
56.4
31 [19–42]
63.0
35 [30–42]
97.3
38 [22–55]
64.0
6 [3–19]
91.3
48 [40–54]
45.9
3 [2–14]
66.2
10 [5–21]
Vascular embolus
No (n = 60)
65.0
26 [14–45]
70.2
35 [31–43]
89.7d
45 [26–59]
55.0
10 [3–19]c
92.5
50 [42–57]
51.7
3 [2–13]
70.2
9 [5–20]
Yes (n = 49)
59.2
31 [19–39]
55.3
37 [30–43]
100
39 [22–50]
65.9
3 [2–11]
86.0
48 [40–53]
40.0
5 [2–20]
66.7
11 [5–20]
pTNM stage
I-II (n = 40)
70.0
30 [14–47]
67.6
37 [33–45]
89.7d
46 [35–59]
59.0
10 [3–28]c
91.9
49 [41–56]
51.3
3 [2–8]
64.1
9 [5–19]
 
III-IV (n = 59)
59.3
30 [19–40]
60.3
39 [32–43]
100
40 [22–53]
58.2
4 [2–17]
87.8
49 [41–54]
41.8
5 [2–20]
70.0
12 [5–28]
Depth of invasion
T1-2 (n = 25)
68.0
34 [11–52]
72.7
36 [31–44]
84.0e
48 [36–59]
73.9
10 [3–21]
86.4
52 [44–56]
47.8
2 [2–4]
70.8
9 [3–19]
T3 (n = 53)
62.3
28 [17–41]
58.5
35 [30–43]
96.1
43 [28–53]
49.0
7 [2–24]
91.3
46 [36–56]
48.0
5 [2–18]
68.8
10 [5–18]
T4 (n = 25)
60.0
30 [16–38]
62.5
42 [33–44]
100
31 [15–53]
66.7
5 [2–17]
90.9
49 [41–55]
36.0
8 [3–20]
66.7
14 [5–32]
Lymph node metastasis
N0 (n = 57)
68.4
26 [13–47]
67.3
35 [32–43]
89.1d
45 [22–58]
61.8
10 [3–20]
90.6
53 [43–57]c
46.4
2 [2–10]
67.3
9 [5–19]
N1-3 (n = 51)
56.9
31 [21–41]
58.3
39 [30–44]
100
39 [26–52]
58.3
4 [2–16]
88.1
45 [37–52]
47.8
5 [2–20]
69.8
11 [5–23]
Distant metastasis M0 (n = 77)
67.5a
30 [14–44]
64.4
37 [32–43]
92.0
42 [24–56]
60.0
8 [3–19]
91.5
49 [41–56]
46.7
3 [2–13]
68.1
9 [5–17]c
M1 (n = 31) 51.6 30 [21–40] 60.0 36 [30–43] 100 43 [24–53] 60.7 6 [2–17] 83.3 49 [40–53] 48.1 6 [3–20] 69.2 15 [9–28]

* %; [25-75%], 25%-75% percentiles; a, Pearson’s Chi-square test, miR-9-1 for age, differentiation, distant metastasis: χ2 = 7.924, 2.271, 2.402, and P = 0.005, 0.132, 0.121, respectively; b, Student t-test: miR-9-3 for location [42 ± 2 (Mean ± SD) vs 34 ± 1], t = 3.303, P = 0.002; miR-137 for age [34 ± 3 vs 44 ± 3], t = −2.651, P = 0.009; for location [46 ± 3 vs 37 ± 2], t = 2.103, P =0.038; c, Mann–Whitney U-test: miR-34b for pTNM stage/ vascular embolus, U = 239.000/320.000, P = 0.028/0.025, miR-200b for lymph node metastasis, U = 627.000, P = 0.021; miR-210 for distant metastasis, U = 301.000, P = 0.048; d, Fisher’s exact test: miR-137 for vascular embolus/pTNM/lymph metastasis, P = 0.031/0.024/0.028; miR-200b for location, P = 0.002; e,Trend test: miR-137 for depth of invasion, χ2 = 6.330, P = 0.012.