Skip to main content
. 2012 Dec 7;7(12):e51048. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0051048

Table 2. Description of the 527 COPD patients based on phenotypes identified by cluster analysis.

Phenotype 1 Phenotype 2 Phenotype 3 P value
n = 219 n = 99 n = 209
DATA USED IN THE CLUSTER ANALYSIS
Quantitative data
Age, yrs. 62 [58–68] 61 [57–66] 72 [65–77] <0.001
BMI, kg/m2 25 [23–28] 20 [18–22] 26 [24–29] <0.001
FEV1, % predicted 80 [65–94] 29 [21–37] 44 [36–58] <0.001
Dyspnoea, mMRC scale 0 [0–1] 2 [1][3] 2 [2][3] <0.001
Clinical COPD Questionnaire, Total 1.8 [1.0–3.0] 6.8 [5.0–9.0] 6.3 [4.5–8.0] <0.001
TGV, % predicted 126 [112–147] 195 [177–220] 139 [115–161] <0.001
DLCO, % predicted 74 [60–86] 34 [25–39] 47 [38–61] <0.001
Categorical data
CT scan *
Emphysema present, % 48 96 81 <0.001
Alveolar destruction
Absent (%) 52 4 19 <0.001
Mild (%) 35 9 32
Moderate (%) 8 43 27
Severe (%) 5 44 22
Bronchial thickening
Mild (%) 57 36 20 <0.001
Moderate (%) 33 45 52
Severe (%) 9 19 27
Bronchiectasis, % 14 31 33 <0.001
Comorbidities
Ischemic heart disease, % 14 17 34 <0.001
Stroke, % 0 2 8 <0.001
Peripheral arterial disease * , % 10 11 19 0.08
Diabetes, % 9 11 20 0.003
Muscle weakness * , % 18 47 42 <0.001
Osteoporosis, % 8 31 22 <0.001
Anaemia, % 5 15 10 0.005
DATA NOT USED IN THE CLUSTER ANALYSIS
Male sex, % 80 66 80 0.007
GOLD stage <0.001
G I, % (% of all GOLD stage I) 50 (91) 0 (0) 5 (9)
G II,% (% of all GOLD stage II) 39 (51) 8 (5) 36 (44)
G III, % (% of all GOLD stage III) 9 (13) 37 (25) 44 (62)
G IV, % (% of all GOLD stage IV) 2 (5) 55 (61) 15 (35)
Source of recruitment
NELSON cohort, % (% NELSON) 67 (95) 0 (0) 3 (5) <0.001
LEUVEN clinic, % (% LEUVEN) 33 (19) 100 (27) 97 (54) <0.001
Smoking, pack-year 44 [34–60] 48 [33–56] 48 [31–65] 0.89
FEV1, L 2.4 [1.9–2.9] 0.8 [0.6–1.0] 1.25 [1.0–1.6] <0.001
FVC, % predicted 105 [92–118] 72 [61–86] 82 [69–94] <0.001
FVC, L 4.0 [3.3–4.6] 2.6 [1.9–3.2] 2.8 [2.3–3.3] <0.001
FEV1/FVC ratio 0.62 [0.53–0.67] 0.33 [0.27–0.38] 0.44 [0.37–0.55] <0.001
RV,% predicted 128 [109–149] 227 [186–268] 144 [113–174] <0.001
TLC, % predicted 106 100–118] 128 [116–139] 104 [91–114] <0.001
Raw, % predicted 174 [140–223] 274 [215–379] 249 [198–317] <0.001
Sgaw, % predicted 68 [51–87] 29 [22–40] 44 [32–64] <0.001
Kco, % predicted 86 [71–98] 53 [45–62] 70 [56–91] <0.001
Mortality, n (%) 1 (0.5%) 20 (20.6%) 29 (14.3%) <0.001
*

% missing data: Phenotype 1∶67%; Phenotype 2∶1%, Phenotype 3∶4%.

P values correspond to comparisons between the 3 phenotypes using Kruskal-Wallis or Chi-square tests, as appropriate.