Skip to main content
. 2012 Aug 4;23(1):246–252. doi: 10.1007/s00330-012-2590-3

Table 3.

Comparison between first and second MR examinations: weighted mean T1 values of each ROI with manual slice-matching and automated registration

Patients Controls
Manual matching Registration Manual matching Registration
ICC(2,1) (CI) 0.893 (0.813–0.940) 0.902 (0.827–0.945) 0.849 (0.732–0.917) 0.851 (0.736–0.919)
r (CI) 0.892 (0.809–0.940) 0.901 (0.824–0.945) 0.855 (0.742–0.921) 0.858 (0.745–0.923)
slope (CI) 1.030 (0.412–1.649) 1.036 (0.383–1.688) 1.044 (0.589–1.499) 1.065 (0.506–1.624)

ICC(2,1) two-way random intraclass correlation coefficient based on single measures, r Pearson’s correlation coefficient, slope the slope obtained with a total least squares fit, CI 95% confidence interval