Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 May 15.
Published in final edited form as: AIDS. 2012 May 15;26(8):987–995. doi: 10.1097/QAD.0b013e3283522d47

Table 2.

Clinical impact, costs, and incremental cost-effectiveness of TB screening strategies among individuals initiating ART in South Africa.

Strategy TB-infected LE (months) Population LE (months) Lifetime Cost (2010 USD) ICER ($/YLS)
undiscounted discounted undiscounted discounted
No Screening 116.2 90.6 151.7 117.0 31,240 --

Smear-2-Symptoms* 118.4 92.3 152.2 117.4 31,320 2,600

Smear-2-All 118.8 92.6 152.3 117.5 31,340 2,800

Culture-2-Symptoms 121.4 94.5 152.9 117.9 31,520 dominated

Culture-2-All 122.4 95.3 153.1 118.1 31,580 5,100

Xpert-1-Symptoms 122.3 95.2 153.1 118.0 31,610 dominated

Xpert-1-All 123.4 96.0 153.3 118.2 31,670 dominated

Xpert-2-Symptoms 123.7 96.2 153.4 118.3 31,690 dominated

Xpert-2-All 125.1 97.3 153.7 118.5 31,770 5,100

Costs in 2010 U.S. dollars and are discounted. LE: life expectancy. ICER: incremental cost-effectiveness ratio. YLS: year of life saved. Culture strategies included smear microscopy and drug susceptibility testing on cultures.

Numbers in the table have been rounded; small deviations in individual calculations may be due to rounding.

*

Format of strategies is test-number-population, such that Smear-2-Symptoms refers to two smears in symptomatic individuals, etc.

§

‘dominated’: strategies with lower life expectancy and higher cost, or a higher ICER than a more effective strategy.

ICER for Culture-2-All ($5,060/YLS) is less than ICER for Xpert-2-All ($5,140/YLS), but appears same due to rounding.