Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Alzheimers Dement. 2012 Jan 30;8(5):389–398. doi: 10.1016/j.jalz.2011.07.003

Table 3.

FDG PET and PiB Distribution

FDG PiB
Index A-P (%) L-R (%) A-P (%) L-R (%)
Probable AD (n=39) −0.2 (8.0) 1.1 (9.0) 18.5 (10.1) −0.9 (6.1)
All pAD (n=7) −2.7 (−12.3 – 17.9) −4.5 (−25.4 – 7.3)
PiB− pAD (n=3) −8.1 (−12.3 – 5.7) −9.5 # (−25.4 – −0.3)
PiB+ pAD (n=4) 2.7 (−8.5 – 17.9) 0.4 (−4.0 – 7.3) 14.2 (−1.2 – 27.7) −2.3 (−13.7 – 5.4)
All DUE (n=10) −5.8 (−28.5 – 5.4) −1.4 (−14.0 – 14.3)
PiB− DUE (n=7) −6.6 (−28.5 – 5.4) −3.2 (−14.0 – 14.3)
PiB+ DUE (n=3) −4.4 (−5.0 – −3.7) 1.2 (−0.1 – 2.6) 23.4 (12.3 – 36.7) 5.1 (0.5 – 10.3)
All PCA (n=5) 7.6 (−2.2 – 38.7) −5.4 (−17.1 – 3.7)
PiB− PCA (n=2) 1.4 (1.0 – 1.8) −1.2 (−6.1 – 3.7)
PIB+ PCA (n=3) 11.7 (−2.2 – 38.7) −8.2 (−17.1 – 3.3) 2.1* (−7.5 – 10.1) 2.7 (−2.8 – 6.5)
All PPA (n=5) −4.0 (−9.3 – 3.3) −7.3 # (−19.1 – 6.6)
PiB− PPA (n=4) −5.8 (−9.3 – −0.4) −4.4 (−15.6 – 6.63)
PiB+ PPA (n=1) 3.3 −19.1 43.3 −4.3

Note that 1 aAD (PiB+ patient), 1 DUE (PiB+ patient), and 8 probable AD patients did not have an FDG PET scan;

*

: p < 0.05,

#

p < 0.1 vs. probable AD.

Standard deviation and range presented in parentheses for the probable AD and other diagnostic categories, respectively.