Skip to main content
. 2012 Sep 20;12:416. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-12-416

Table 6.

Patients’ characteristics stratified by Copy number alternation of PIC3CA

Variable Copy number of PIK3CA (Not Amplified n = 78) Copy number of PIK3CA (Amplification n = 37) P value
Age: mean ± SD
64.8 ± 11.6
65.6 ± 9.9
0.60*
Sex: Male/Female
63 / 15
30 / 7
0.96
Number of metastatic
 
 
 
Lymph nodes:
0/0/1.5
0/0/0
0.65
25%/50%/75%
Primary site
 
 
0.39
Oropharyngeal
15(19.2%)
10(27.0%)
Hypopharyngeal
16(20.5%)
9(24.3%)
Laryngeal
15(19.2%)
8(21.6%)
Oral cavity
22(28.2%)
9(24.3%)
Nasal cavity
10(12.8%)
1(2.7%)
Tumor grade:
28/35/15
18/12/7
0.37
well/ moderate/poor
(35.9%/44.9%/19.2%)
(48.6%/32.4%/18.9%)
TNM classification
 
 
 
T stage: T1/T2/T3/T4
12/30/17/19
4/15/10/8
0.85
(15.3%/38.5%/21.8%/24.4%)
(10.8%/40.5%/ 27.0%/21.6%)
N stage: N0/N1/N2
43/12/23
16/5/16
0.34
(55.1%/15.4%/29.5%)
(43.2%/13.5%/43.2%)
Stage : I/ II/III/IV
11/16/17/34
1/7/9/20
0.28
(14.1%/20.5%/21.8%/43.6%)
(2.7%/18.9%/ 24.3%/54.1%)
Pack-year(tobacco) mean ± SD 19.6 ± 24.3 22.3 ± 24.6 0.64*

* Student t test † Chi-square test ‡ Fisher test.

The patients’ characteristics stratified by the PIK3CA copy number alteration. There was no significant association.