Table 6.

Results of group comparisons between the agrammatic and the two control groups across experimental conditions and electrode regions in the specified time intervals

msec	Effect	Electrode Region
		CC	PC	LCP	RCP	LP	RP	LF	RF
				Agrammatic vs. Young Controls
AS violation (‘the’)
300–500	GxC	ns	ns	4.09*	ns	ns	ns	ns	ns
	Group	ns	ns	4.34*	ns	ns	ns	ns	ns
500–700		ns	ns	ns	ns	ns	ns	ns	ns
AS violation (‘doctor’)
300–500	GxC	ns	ns	ns	ns	ns	ns	ns	ns
	Group	8.98**	ns	10.39**	4.64*	ns	ns	ns	ns
500–700		ns	ns	ns	ns	ns	ns	ns	ns
Semantic violation
300–500	GxC	ns	5.46*	ns	ns	4.54*	6.13*	ns	ns
	Group	ns	ns	ns	ns	ns	ns	ns	ns
500–700	GxC	ns	ns	ns	ns	ns	ns	ns	5.40*
	Group	6.10*	ns	5.49*	ns	12.72*	ns	ns	ns
		Agrammatic vs. Age Matched
AS violation (‘the’)
300–500	GxC	ns	ns	ns	ns	ns	ns	ns	ns
	Group	ns	ns	5.86*	ns	6.80*	ns	ns	ns
500–700	GxC	ns	ns	ns	ns	ns	ns	ns	ns
	Group	ns	ns	ns	ns	ns	ns	ns	ns
700–800	GxC	ns	ns	4.19*	ns	ns	ns	ns	ns
	Group	ns	ns	5.64*	ns	ns	Ns	9.61**	7.03*
AS violation (‘doctor’)
300–500	GxC	ns	ns	ns	ns	4.67*	ns	ns	ns
	Group	14.70***	10.51	10.92**	12.60***	7.68**	10.49**	ns	ns
500–700	GxC	ns	ns	8.58**	ns	4.45*	ns	ns	ns
	Group	ns	ns	ns	ns	ns	ns	ns	ns
Semantic violation
300–500		ns	ns	ns	ns	ns	ns	ns	ns
500–700	GxC	ns	ns	ns	ns	ns	ns	ns	ns
	Group	ns	ns	ns	6.15*	ns	ns	ns	7.88**

Note:

^*p < 05;

^**p < .01,

^***p < .001