Table 2.
Analysis | Increase in BMI | P Value for Interaction | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
<1 Serving per Month | 1–4 Servings per Month | 2–6 Servings per Week | ≥1 Serving per Day | ||
Sugar-sweetened beverages | |||||
| |||||
NHS cohort | |||||
| |||||
Model 1† | 1.17±0.18 | 1.66±0.16 | 1.84±0.23 | 2.12±0.39 | 0.004 |
| |||||
Model 2‡ | 1.18±0.17 | 1.56±0.16 | 1.78±0.22 | 2.03±0.38 | 0.008 |
| |||||
HPFS cohort | |||||
| |||||
Model 1† | 0.80±0.20 | 0.42±0.21 | 1.05±0.19 | 1.59±0.37 | 0.06 |
| |||||
Model 2‡ | 0.77±0.19 | 0.43±0.20 | 1.08±0.19 | 1.54±0.37 | 0.02 |
| |||||
Pooled cohorts§ | |||||
| |||||
Model 1† | 1.00±0.13 | 1.20±0.13 | 1.37±0.15 | 1.85±0.27 | <0.001 |
| |||||
Model 2‡ | 1.00±0.13 | 1.12±0.12 | 1.38±0.14 | 1.78±0.27 | <0.001 |
| |||||
Artificially sweetened beverages | |||||
| |||||
NHS cohort | |||||
| |||||
Model 1† | 1.43±0.20 | 1.37±0.21 | 1.43±0.20 | 1.42±0.29 | 0.88 |
| |||||
Model 2‡ | 1.42±0.18 | 1.25±0.21 | 1.39±0.20 | 1.36±0.27 | 0.91 |
| |||||
HPFS cohort | |||||
| |||||
Model 1† | 0.94±0.18 | 0.78±0.24 | 0.40±0.20 | 1.04±0.31 | 0.63 |
| |||||
Model 2‡ | 0.95±0.18 | 0.76±0.23 | 0.45±0.20 | 0.92±0.29 | 0.46 |
| |||||
Pooled cohorts§ | |||||
| |||||
Model 1† | 1.16±0.13 | 1.11±0.16 | 0.92±0.14 | 1.24±0.21 | 0.83 |
| |||||
Model 2‡ | 1.19±0.13 | 1.03±0.16 | 0.92±0.14 | 1.16±0.20 | 0.64 |
Plus–minus values are β coefficients ±SE. Data were derived from repeated-measures analysis for women in the NHS (five measures during the period from 1980 to 1998) and for men in the HPFS (three measures during the period from 1986 to 1998). Data on beverage intake were assessed 4 years before the assessment of BMI.
Data were adjusted for age and source of genotyping data.
Data were further adjusted for level of physical activity, time spent watching television, status with respect to current smoking, alcohol intake, Alternative Healthy Eating Index score, and total energy intake.
Results for the two cohorts were pooled by means of inverse-variance–weighted, fixed-effects meta-analyses.