Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Med Virol. 2012 Jul;84(7):1106–1114. doi: 10.1002/jmv.23302

TABLE IV.

Association of ITPA With Treatment Response (RVR, EVR, and SVR) in Patients Coinfected With HIV and HCV

RVR EVR SVR



Baseline characteristics Odds ratio P-value Odds ratio P-value Odds ratio P-value
[A] Association of the response with baseline characteristics based on univariate logistic regression
    ITPA deficiency 4.952 0.012 0.823 0.748 2.776 0.093
    Age 0.959 0.276 0.973 0.436 0.936 0.076
    Gender 0.684 0.569 1.032 0.96 1.384 0.617
    BMI 0.991 0.661 0.988 0.4 0.976 0.607
    Baseline HIV VL 0.791 0.578 0.989 0.974 1.764 0.113
    Baseline HCV VL 0.28 0.003 0.8 0.508 0.783 0.463
    Baseline Hgb 1.037 0.877 1.178 0.447 1.571 0.055
    Fibrosis (≥2) 0.611 0.069 1.245 0.328 1.012 0.958
    Creatine 4.121 0.485 8.469 0.281 5.966 0.35
    Platelet count 1 0.979 0.998 0.455 0.997 0.467
    CD4 count 1.001 0.377 1 0.558 1 0.571
    CD4% 1.02 0.492 0.989 0.682 1.028 0.318
    AZT use 3.417 0.085 88664074 0.993 3.469 0.08
    IL28 1.231 0.745 17 0.008 2 0.236
[B] Multivariate logistic regression on the association of ITPA with the responses adjusting for IL28
    ITPA deficiency 6.358 0.006 0.881 0.851 3.383 0.054
    IL28 1.402 0.627 16.936 0.008 2.215 0.192

There was no ribavirin reduction in HIV/HCV coinfected patients.

For RVR, only ITPA and baseline HCV are of significant association.

For EVR, only IL28 is of significant association.

For SVR, no baseline characteristics are of significant association.

After adjusting for IL28, ITPA is still significantly associated with RVR, not significantly associated with EVR, and associated with SVR with marginal significance, that is about the same pattern as the univariate logistic regression results.