Skip to main content
. 2012 Dec 3;2012:874601. doi: 10.1155/2012/874601

Table 1.

Studies on VGC in the preemptive setting after alloHSCT.

Author
year [ref.]
Design N patients VGC dose VGC efficacy Toxicity reported
van der Heiden et al. 2006 [5] Retrospective
VGC/GCV
34 1800 mg/d 80% None
Ayala et al. 2006 [6] Retrospective
VGC mono
18 1800 mg/d ×  14,
→ 900 mg/d × ≥7
93% None
Busca et al. 2007 [7] Retrospective
VGC mono
15 1800 mg/d × 14,
→ 900 mg/d × 14
73% 27% severe hematotoxicity
Candoni et al. 2008 [8] Retrospective
VGC mono
30 1800 mg/d
versus 900 mg/d
93%
87%
≤WHO °II
de la Cruz-Vicente et al. 2008 [9] Prospective
VGC/GCV
11 1800 mg/d × 14,
→ 900 mg/d × 14
100% None
Wang et al. 2008 [10] Retrospective
VGC mono
19 1800 mg/d × 14,
→ 900 mg/d × 14
95% None
Takenaka et al. 2009 [11] Retrospective
VGC mono
10 1800 mg/d × 21 90% 10% severe neutropenias
Saleh et al. 2010 [12] Retrospective
VGC mono
47 1800 mg/d ×≥7,
→ 900 mg/d ×≥7
97% 17% severe neutropenias
Palladino et al. 2010 [13] Retrospective
VGC mono
34 1800 mg/d
versus 900 mg/d
100%
83%
None
Liu et al. 2010 [14] Prospective
VGC mono
54 1800 mg/d × 14,
→ 900 mg/d × 14
89% None
Ruiz-Camps et al. 2011 [15] Prospective
VGC/GCV
166 91% 5% adverse events