Skip to main content
. 2012 Feb;3(Suppl 1):59–66. doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1298610

Table 2. Function, pain, and health-related quality of life outcomes following C-ADR versus fusion from two FDA trials with follow-up of 48 months or more.*.

Mean difference in scores from preop to follow-up
Mean preop score 60 mo
C-ADR (n = 276) Fusion (n = 265) C-ADR (n = 144) Fusion (n = 127) P
Burkus et al 1 (2010)
(N = 541)
NDI 55.7 56.4 38.4 34.1 .022
Neck pain 68.2 69.3 56.0 52.4 NS
Arm pain 59.1 62.4 52.5 47.7 NS
SF-36 PCS 31.9 32.0 14.7 12.9 NS
Mean preop score 48 mo
C-ADR (n = 242) Fusion (n = 221) C-ADR (n = 181) Fusion (n =138) P
Sasso et al 2 (2011) (N = 463) NDI 51.4 ± 15.3 50.2 ± 15.9 39.0 ± 19.1 31.2 ± 21.3 < .001
Neck pain 75.4 ± 19.9 74.8 ± 23.0 54.0 ± 29.3 44.7 ± 33.6 .001
Arm pain 71.2 ± 19.5 71.2 ± 25.1 55.5 ± 27.5 50.3 ± 35.9 .028
SF-36 PCS 32.6 ± 6.7 31.8 ± 7.2 15.7 ± 11.1 13.1 ± 12.0 .007
*

C-ADR indicates cervical artificial disc replacement; FDA, US Food and Drug Administration; NDI, Neck Disability Index; SF-36, Short-Form 36 Questionnaire; and PCS, Physical Component Score.

P values compare the mean improvement in scores from baseline to each follow-up time-point between C-ADR and fusion.