Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: J R Stat Soc Series B Stat Methodol. 2012 Apr 12;74(5):849–870. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9868.2011.01026.x

Table 1.

Performance comparison under linear models: FP is the average number of irrelevant variables falsely selected by the method, and FN is the average number of true variables falsely excluded by the method; the number in (·) is the standard error of the FP or FN and NA* indicates that the corresponding algorithm broke down.

Methods p = 8, n = 40, σ = 3, ρ = 0.5 p = 1000, n = 200, σ = 1, ρ = 0.5

FP
(0, 5)
FN
(0, 3)
FP
(0,990)
FN
(0,10)
LASSO 0.77(0.093) 0.16(0.037) 8.87(0.586) 0.00(0.000)
SCAD 0.67(0.094) 0.10(0.030) 6.05(0.926) 1.16(0.150)
MARS 4.00(0.059) 0.04(0.020) 30.64(0.165) 0.00(0.000)
SSIR 0.19(0.051) 0.96(0.068) NA* NA*
COP 0.71(0.080) 0.56(0.066) 2.28(0.203) 0.75(0.095)