Skip to main content
. 2012 Nov 11;7:87. doi: 10.1186/1750-1172-7-87

Table 2.

Efficacy results

ITT population (n=17) Baseline 6 months 12 months 24 months
50% reduction from baseline1
n (%) [95%CI]
-
11 (64.7%)
14 (82.4%)
10 (58.82%)
 
 
 
[38.3% to 85.8%]
[56.6% to 96.2%]
[32.92% to 81.56%]
30% reduction from baseline2
n (%) [95%CI]
-
15 (88.2%)
17 (100.0%)
14 (82.4%)
 
 
 
[63.6% to 98.5%]
[83.8% to 100.0%]
[56.6% to 96.2%]
Adjusted baseline change (%)
LSMean [95%CI]
0
−55.18 [−65.85 to −44.51]
−66.38 [−75.77 to −56.98]
−62.08 [−72.70 to −51.46]
 
 6 vs 12 months
-
Ref
−11.20 [−5.61 to −16.78] p<0.001
-
 
 12 vs 24 months
-
-
Ref
4.30 [−2.61 to 11.21] p=0.205
Absolute values (cm3)
LSMean [95%CI]
62.65 [24.05 to 101.25]
28.62 [12.91 to 44.33]
23.07 [8.29 to 37.84]
21.68 [11.30 to 32.06]
 
 0 vs 6 months
Ref
−34.03 [−9.90 to −58.16] p=0.008
-
-
 
 0 vs 12 months
Ref
-
−39.58 [−14.74 to −64.42] p=0.004
-
   0 vs 24 months Ref - - −40.97 [−11.15 to −70.79] p=0.010

Response of angiomyolipoma to rapamycin therapy: tumour volume and baseline reduction.

Figures for continuous variables are least square means (LSMean) and [95%CI] from the mixed models for repeated measurements (MMRM) analysis, for binary variables frequencies, (%) and [95%]. Values in the MMRM analysis are adjusted by the baseline volume, when specified.

1: Main predefined outcome in the protocol. 2: Reduction cut-off point according to the RECIST criteria.