Table 1. Proportion of fecal samples positive for presumptive STEC.
Method1 | Source | Number of positive samples/Number of fecal samples tested per sampling site2 | |||||
Site A | Site B | Site C | Site D | Site E | Total | ||
Direct plating | Cattle | 0/12 | 1/12 | 0/12 | 1/12 | 0/12 | 2/60 |
Chicken | 0/12 | 0/12 | NA3 | NA | NA | 0/24 | |
Sheep | 0/12 | NA | 2/12 | NA | 2/12 | 4/36 | |
Total | 0/36 | 1/24 | 2/24 | 1/12 | 2/24 | 6/120 | |
IMS | Cattle | 0/12 | 0/12 | 4/12 | 3/12 | 2/12 | 9/60 |
Chicken | 0/12 | 1/12 | NA | NA | NA | 1/24 | |
Sheep | 2/12 | NA | 5/12 | NA | 2/12 | 9/36 | |
Total | 2/36 | 1/24 | 9/24 | 3/12 | 4/24 | 19/120 |
Enrichment broths were subjected to direct plating from July to December 2008 or to immunomagnetic separation (IMS) from January to June 2009.
Sampling sites correspond to regions in the Culiacan Valley, Sinaloa, Mexico, as shown in Figure 1.
NA, None available.