TABLE 2.

Daily planned content of 28-day high- and low-glycemic load diets and consumption of high- and low-glycemic load test breakfasts for participants of the cross-over glycemic load diet study

	Mean daily planned^a N = 16		Test breakfast consumption N = 16
	High-glycemic load	Low-glycemic load	High-glycemic load	Low-glycemic load
Energy (kcal)^b	2621 ± 346.3	2554 ± 331^*	549 ± 84	589 ± 62^*
Energy (kcal)^c	2630 ± 326	2656 ± 345	554 ± 84	587 ± 61^*
Protein (g)	99 ± 13	97 ± 12	15 ± 2	20 ± 2^*
Energy protein (%)	15 ± 0	16 ± 0^*	11 ± 1	14 ± 1^*
Fat (g)	89 ± 12	88 ± 11	20 ± 5	18 ± 3
Energy fat (%)	31 ± 1	32 ± 0^*	32 ± 4	27 ± 3^*
Available carbohydrate (g)	340 ± 42	327 ± 41^*	79 ± 9	87 ± 11^*
Total carbohydrate (g)	370 ± 49	384 ± 50^*	80 ± 10	94 ± 11^*
Energy available carbohydrate (%)	54 ± 1^*	53 ± 0^*	57 ± 4	59 ± 3
Dietary fiber (g)	29 ± 4^*	55 ± 7^*	2 ± 1	7 ± 1^*
Glycemic load	267 ± 37^*	125 ± 16^*	63 ± 8	32 ± 4^*

Mean ± SD; N=16.

Mean percent consumed of average daily planned content of high- and low-glycemic load diets was between 97 ± 3 and 99% ± 2;

Based on data reported in Nutrition Data System for Research (version 2005, Nutrition Coordinating Center, University of Minnesota);

Based on calculation using 4 kcal/g protein, 9 kcal/g fat, 4 kcal/g available carbohydrate.

Star (*) indicates p values < 0.05 for paired t test of means, comparing high and low glycemic load.