Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Ren Nutr. 2012 Sep 7;23(3):185–193. doi: 10.1053/j.jrn.2012.06.005

Table 3.

Statistical comparison of the changes for the primary and secondary endpoints between baseline vs. week 8 (Phase I: Vitamin D withdrawal period) and between week 8 vs. week 16 (Phase II: randomization to Paracalcitriol versus Cinacalcet). Data are presented as P values.

Variables Phase I
Comparison
between
Baseline –to-
8 weeks
Phase II
Comparison between
8 weeks-to-16 weeks
Unadjusted Adjusted
Insulin Resistance Indices
GDR 0.7 0.9 0.86
HOMA-IR 0.1 0.4 0.74
QUICKI 0.04* 0.4 0.78
HOMA-adiponectin 0.24 0.25 0.53
Leptin-adiponectin-ratio 0.9 0.6 0.74
Biomarkers of Inflammation
IL-6 0.57 0.5 0.87
hsCRP 0.3 0.5 0.81
Adipocytokines
Adiponectin 0.5 0.3 0.08
Leptin 0.3 0.7 0.53
Mineral Metabolism parameters
Parathyroid hormone, pg,mL 0.02* 0.06 0.2
Calcium, mg/dL
Phosphorus, mg/dL

Comparison from baseline to 8 weeks: p values were calculated using Wilcoxon Signed Rank test to compare the changes in outcomes from baseline to week 8.

Comparison from 8 weeks to 16 weeks:

Unadjusted: p values were calculated using multivariable linear regression. Independent variables included: treatment assignment and corresponding outcomes measured at week 8.

Adjusted: p values were calculated using multivariable linear regression with independent variables including: treatment assignment and corresponding outcomes measured at week 8, and propensity score [propensity scores were estimated through binary logistic regression providing the predicted probability of being assigned into treatment group A as a function of other risk factors including age, truncal fat, IL6, pth and leptin]