Skip to main content
. 2012 Dec 6;4:361–374. doi: 10.2147/CEOR.S37458

Table S2.

Baseline characteristics of included studies on diabetic macular edema

Author Year Treatment Age (years) VA (ETDRS letters) CMT (μm) Duration of DM (years) % PDR Follow-up (weeks)
Scott et al28 2007 IVB 1.25 mg vs photocoagulation 65 65 411 NA NA 12
Faghihi et al30 2008 IVB 1.25 mg vs photocoagulation 57 63 359.6 NA NA 16
Soheilian et al29 2009 IVB 1.25 mg vs photocoagulation 61.2 67 333.33 10.5 6 24
Michaelides et al27 2010 IVB 1.25 mg vs photocoagulation 64.2 55 494.65 14 NA 52
Solaiman et al31 2010 IVB 1.25 mg vs photocoagulation 57 58 455.88 18 34 24
Nguyen et al45 2010 IVR 0.5 mg vs photocoagulation 62 NA 441.65 NA NA 24
Mitchell et al46 2011 IVR 0.5 mg vs photocoagulation 63.5 63 405 NA NA 52

Abbreviations: VA, visual acuity; CMT, central macular thickness; ETDRS, early treatment diabetic retinopathy study; DM, diabetes mellitus; IVB, intravitreal bevacizumab; IVR, intravitreal ranibizumab; NA, not applicable; PDR, proliferative diabetic retinopathy; VA, visual acuity.