Skip to main content
. 2012 Dec 12;345:e8013. doi: 10.1136/bmj.e8013

Table 2.

 Comparison of self taken vulvovaginal swabs with clinician taken endocervical swabs as diagnostic samples for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis infection among 3867 women recruited at a sexual health centre. Values are numbers of women unless stated otherwise

Chlamydia infection status Total % Sensitivity (95% CI) P value*
Positive Negative
Whole cohort
Endocervical swab: 88 (85 to 91) <0.00001
 Positive 350 0 350
 Negative 46 3471 3517
 Total 396 3471 3867
Vulvovaginal swab: 97 (95 to 98)
 Positive 384 2 386
 Negative 12 3469 3481
 Total 396 3471 3867
Women with symptoms suggestive of bacterial sexually transmitted infection
Endocervical swab: 88 (83 to 92) 0.0008
 Positive 187 0 187
 Negative 26 1421 1447
 Total 213 1421 1634
Vulvovaginal swab: 97 (93 to 98)
 Positive 206 1 207
 Negative 7 1420 1427
 Total 213 1421 1634
Women without symptoms suggestive of bacterial sexually transmitted infection
Endocervical swab: 89 (84 to 93) 0.0025
 Positive 163 0 163
 Negative 20 2050 2070
 Total 183 2050 2233
Vulvovaginal swab: 97 (94 to 99)
 Positive 178 1 179
 Negative 5 2049 2054
 Total 183 2050 2233
Women suitable for asymptomatic screen
Endocervical swab: 89 (81 to 95) 0.2668
 Positive 68 0 68
 Negative 8 1271 1279
 Total 76 1271 1347
Vulvovaginal swab: 95 (87 to 98)
 Positive 72 1 73
 Negative 4 1270 1274
 Total 76 1271 1347

*Endocervical swab compared with vulvovaginal swab.