. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Dec 12.

Published in final edited form as: Brain Imaging Behav. 2010 Jun;4(2):132–140. doi: 10.1007/s11682-010-9092-1

Table 2.

Multiple regression analyses of average FA within each significant cluster and Word Attack raw score after accounting for age at the time of evaluation and risk

Regression Model^*	R²	F (3, 50) (p-value)	Standardized Coefficient Beta^** (p-value)	R² Change
L Pons-Medulla Oblongata	.526	18.51 (< 0.001)	.330 (0.020)	.055
R Pons	.566	21.70 (< 0.001)	.410 (0.002)	.095
L Posterior Limb of IC	.531	18.82 (< 0.001)	.276 (0.015)	.060
R Posterior Limb of IC	.555	20.79 (< 0.001)	.310 (0.003)	.084
L Temporal Occipital	.516	17.95 (< 0.001)	.259 (0.036)	.045
R Knee of IC	.576	22.65 (< 0.001)	.390 (0.001)	.105
R Occipital Lobe	.567	21.78 (< 0.001)	.353 (0.002)	.096
L Inferior Parietal	.565	21.66 (< 0.001)	.369 (0.002)	.094

L=Left, R=Right, IC=Internal Capsule

Predictors included in model: (constant), age at evaluation, risk, FA of cluster listed

^**

Beta coefficient and significance of cluster listed after accounting for age at evaluation and risk