Table 3.
Analysis of 'dynamism' in cores and attachments of complexes predicted from PPI networks
| PPI Network | #Complexes (annotated) | Enrichment E | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Attach | Core | ||||
| Static | Dynamic | Static | Dynamic | ||
| ICD(G+K) | 49 | 0.523 | 0.179 | 0.442 | 0.509 |
| FSW(G+K) | 48 | 0.518 | 0.177 | 0.442 | 0.512 |
| Consol3.19 | 57 | 0.626 | 0.184 | 0.445 | 0.530 |
| Boot0.094 | 52 | 0.661 | 0.192 | 0.562 | 0.586 |
The table compares the relative enrichment of static-to-dynamic proteins within cores and attachments. For complexes (annotated ones only) derived from all four networks, we noticed that the relative enrichment of static proteins within attachments was considerably higher than that of cores. On the other hand, both attachments and cores showed almost equal enrichment of dynamic proteins.