Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Dec 13.
Published in final edited form as: J Med Chem. 2009 Aug 27;52(16):5164–5175. doi: 10.1021/jm900473p

Table 3.

Functional assay results for bifunctional peptide derivative ligands at opioid and Substance P receptors

No Opioid agonist Substance P antagonist

MVD (δ) GPI (μ) GPI

IC50 (nM)a Emax (%)b IC50 (nM)a Emax (%)b Ke (nM)c
1d 15 ± 2.0 100 ± 0 490 ± 29 92.5 ± 3.1 10 ± 2.1
2 14 ± 1.6 100 ± 0 460 ± 160 100 ± 0 10 ± 2.6
3 110 ± 21 100 ± 0 1900 ± 470 100 ± 0 2.8 ± 0.73
4 18 ± 4.9 100 ± 0 250 ± 48 100 ± 0 18 ± 6.0
5 13 ± 5.8 100 ± 0 520 ± 56 95.0 ± 2.9 1.8 ± 0.30
6 17 ± 4.3 100 ± 0 670 ± 134 93.7 ± 4.1 8.4 ± 1.0
Biphalin 2.7 ± 1.5 8.8 ± 0.3
DPDPEe 4.1 7300
DPDPEf 2.5 2720
L-732,138 250 ± 87
a

Concentration at 50% inhibition of muscle contraction at electrically stimulated isolated tissues (n = 4).

b

The δ and μ opioid agonist efficacies (Emax values) of tested compounds were calculated using DPDPE and PL-017 as standards (Emax = 100 %) for MVD and GPI assays, respectively.

c

Inhibitory activity against the Substance P induced muscle contraction in the presence of 1 μM naloxone, Ke: concentration of antagonist needed to inhibit Substance P to half its activity (n = 4).

d

Reference.20

e

Reference.62

f

Reference.63