Skip to main content
. 2012 Dec 13;8(12):e1002800. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002800

Table 1. Lead peptides for the molecular evolution process identified from a panel of alleged GM1-binding peptides.

No. Lead sequences L Fitness Lead sequences D Fitness
1 LPRHRDTGILDSIGRF 34,68 apqrlqwfagplrrfd 157,50
2 DFRRLPGAFWQLRQPA 31,36 tnhyekifsyteslag 102,36
3 PQIAMFCGRLNMNMNV 27,93 drhrplfghrahdmts 90,77
4 GALSETYSFIKEYHNT 26,06 plfghrahdmtsatal 87,02
5 YEVNWKTHEIKVKGQN 25,81 gtdrhrplfghrahdm 82,55
6 AEPQIAMFCGRLNMHM 25,12 ligtdrhrplfghrah 77,87
7 HHCSILKEVWHVKKLG 24,71 fikdnlthiqtnhyea 75,51
8 GWWYKGRARPVSAVAA 24,04 hrplfghrahdmtsat 64,35
9 AKVEKLCVWNNKTPHA 22,65 frgisdligtdrhrpl 59,27
10 ASDWYDEMLTWNIHGA 22,32 mhmnlrgcfmaiqpea 53,31
11 VWRLLAPPFSNRLLPA 21,46 apllrnsfppallrwv 52,06
12 vnmhmnlrgcfmaiqp 51,71
13 lrgcfmaiqpeallga 50,05

Fitness values correspond to fluorescence intensities obtained in a solid-phase binding assay with lysoGM1/DY650-conjugate (arbitrary units) and reflect the probe-binding strength of each peptide. Highlighted amino acids were identified in “alanine walk” experiments as beneficial (boldface) or detrimental (underlined) for binding.