Table 2. Summary of heterozyosity estimates (HE) and Allelic Richness (AR) for all sampled species, populations, time points, including standard errors (SE).
Species | Site | Year | N | HEXP | SE | P(EL) | AR | SE | P(EL) |
An. gambiae (M) | Punta Europa | April, 2004 | 119 | 0.654 | 0.040 | 8.12 | 0.46 | ||
September, 2006 | 63 | 0.648 | 0.033 | 0.56 | 7.79 | 0.51 | 0.26 | ||
August, 2007 | 78 | 0.678 | 0.038 | 7.69 | 0.55 | ||||
April, 2010 | 94 | 0.631 | 0.039 | 0.96 | 7.27 | 0.41 | <0.001 | ||
Ukomba | March, 2007 | 78 | 0.736 | 0.038 | 9.48 | 0.97 | |||
May, 2009 | 46 | 0.681 | 0.037 | 7.98 | 0.51 | 0.042 | |||
February, 2010 | 95 | 0.673 | 0.041 | 0.75 | 7.07 | 0.55 | 0.001 | ||
An. gambiae (S) | Mongomo | February, 2007* | 83 | 0.700 | 0.043 | 9.02 | 0.67 | ||
April, 2009 | 56 | 0.721 | 0.059 | 0.12 | 9.25 | 1.18 | 0.053 | ||
May, 2010 | 53 | 0.734 | 0.033 | 0.07 | 8.28 | 0.86 | 0.119 | ||
Yengue | February, 2007 | 62 | 0.734 | 0.040 | 8.35 | 0.82 | |||
May, 2009 | 92 | 0.715 | 0.043 | 7.52 | 0.67 | 0.069 | |||
May, 2010 | 32 | 0.743 | 0.037 | 0.53 | 8.19 | 0.58 | 0.387 | ||
An. moucheti | Neifang | May, 2007 | 48 | 0.805 | 0.014 | 10.79 | 0.75 | ||
August, 2009 | 34 | 0.845 | 0.011 | 0.36 | 10.19 | 0.82 | 0.184 | ||
An. melas | Arena Blanca | April, 2009 | 89 | 0.484 | 0.066 | 4.8 | 0.6 | ||
September, 2010 | 68 | 0.425 | 0.073 | 0.74 | 3.97 | 0.59 | 0.040 | ||
Cogo | April, 2007 | 70 | 0.649 | 0.069 | 9.98 | 1.89 | |||
June, 2009 | 76 | 0.641 | 0.070 | 0.87 | 9.4 | 1.82 | 0.005 | ||
June, 2010 | 50 | 0.644 | 0.069 | 0.94 | 9.78 | 1.86 | 0.253 |
P values for tests of the null hypothesis that mean heterozygosity or allelic richness is the same between time points (based on a paired t-test) are also presented. Two P(EL) values are reported for the pairwise comparison between the earliest and second, as well as the earliest and latest time points. P-values for comparisons that showed significant differences are in bold.
The February 2007 sample is from the nearby village of Mongomoyen.