Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: Int J Behav Med. 2013 Mar;20(1):140–147. doi: 10.1007/s12529-011-9218-x

Table 2.

Associations of sense of control measures, affect, personality, and social support with the likelihood of fair/poor health, by multivariate logistic regression. Values are odds ratios (95% confidence intervals).*

Set Variables Model 1 Model 2 Model 3
1 Personal mastery 0.76 (0.72 – 0.82) 0.85 (0.79 – 0.92) 0.85 (0.79 – 0.92)
Perceived constraints 1.37 (1.27 – 1.49) 1.12 (1.03 – 1.22) 1.11 (1.02 – 1.22)
Negative affect 1.70 (1.45 – 1.99) 1.64 (1.37 – 1.96)
Positive affect 0.71 (0.60 – 0.83) 0.75 (0.62 – 0.90)
Neuroticism 0.97 (0.78 – 1.21)
Extraversion 0.72 (0.59 – 0.88)
Openness to experiences 1.32 (1.09 – 1.60)
Conscientiousness 0.66 (0.54 – 0.82)
Agreeableness 1.40 (1.17 – 1.67)
Positive social support 1.08 (0.93 – 1.27)
2 Health-specific rating of control 0 – 4 13.03 (10.07 – 16.85) 8.60 (6.56 – 11.28) 9.28 (7.06 – 12.20)
Health-specific rating of control 5 – 6 4.96 (4.09 – 6.02) 3.81 (3.08 – 4.72) 3.89 (3.15 – 4.80)
Health-specific rating of control 7 – 8 1.99 (1.65 – 2.40) 1.71 (1.41 – 2.08) 1.76 (1.45 – 2.13)
Health-specific rating of control 9 – 10 1.00 1.00 1.00
Negative affect 1.67 (1.43 – 1.94) 1.58 (1.31 – 1.90)
Positive affect 0.76 (0.66 – 0.90) 0.80 (0.68 – 0.96)
Neuroticism 0.99 (0.80 – 1.24)
Extraversion 0.73 (0.60 – 0.89)
Openness to experiences 1.41 (1.15 – 1.72)
Conscientiousness 0.68 (0.55 – 0.84)
Agreeableness 1.32 (1.11 – 1.59)
Positive social support 1.07 (0.92 – 1.25)
*

All models also included age, gender, race, Hispanic ethnicity, education level, marital status, log (household income), and log (household income)2.