Table 2.
Set | Variables | Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 3 |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Personal mastery | 0.76 (0.72 – 0.82) | 0.85 (0.79 – 0.92) | 0.85 (0.79 – 0.92) |
Perceived constraints | 1.37 (1.27 – 1.49) | 1.12 (1.03 – 1.22) | 1.11 (1.02 – 1.22) | |
Negative affect | 1.70 (1.45 – 1.99) | 1.64 (1.37 – 1.96) | ||
Positive affect | 0.71 (0.60 – 0.83) | 0.75 (0.62 – 0.90) | ||
Neuroticism | 0.97 (0.78 – 1.21) | |||
Extraversion | 0.72 (0.59 – 0.88) | |||
Openness to experiences | 1.32 (1.09 – 1.60) | |||
Conscientiousness | 0.66 (0.54 – 0.82) | |||
Agreeableness | 1.40 (1.17 – 1.67) | |||
Positive social support | 1.08 (0.93 – 1.27) | |||
2 | Health-specific rating of control 0 – 4 | 13.03 (10.07 – 16.85) | 8.60 (6.56 – 11.28) | 9.28 (7.06 – 12.20) |
Health-specific rating of control 5 – 6 | 4.96 (4.09 – 6.02) | 3.81 (3.08 – 4.72) | 3.89 (3.15 – 4.80) | |
Health-specific rating of control 7 – 8 | 1.99 (1.65 – 2.40) | 1.71 (1.41 – 2.08) | 1.76 (1.45 – 2.13) | |
Health-specific rating of control 9 – 10 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | |
Negative affect | 1.67 (1.43 – 1.94) | 1.58 (1.31 – 1.90) | ||
Positive affect | 0.76 (0.66 – 0.90) | 0.80 (0.68 – 0.96) | ||
Neuroticism | 0.99 (0.80 – 1.24) | |||
Extraversion | 0.73 (0.60 – 0.89) | |||
Openness to experiences | 1.41 (1.15 – 1.72) | |||
Conscientiousness | 0.68 (0.55 – 0.84) | |||
Agreeableness | 1.32 (1.11 – 1.59) | |||
Positive social support | 1.07 (0.92 – 1.25) |
All models also included age, gender, race, Hispanic ethnicity, education level, marital status, log (household income), and log (household income)2.