Table 3.
Outcome of endovascular intervention for post-pancreatectomy haemorrhage (PPH)
| Patient no. | Age, years | Sex | Primary pathology | Fistula | Day of PPH | Site of PPH | Coiling/stenting | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 67 | M | Ampullary adenocarcinoma | Yes | 25 | Pseudoaneurysm splenic artery | Coil | Survived |
| 2 | 58 | M | Ampullary adenocarcinoma | Yes | 30 | Pseudoaneurysm of jejunal branch of SMA | Coil | Survived |
| 3 | 71 | M | Neuroendocrine tumour | No | 7 | Pseudoaneurysm proximal branch of SMA | Coil | Survived |
| 4 | 77 | F | Ductal adenocarcinoma | No | 3 | Pseudoaneurysm CHA | Stent | Died |
| 5 | 75 | F | Cholangiocarcinoma | Yes | 17 | Pseudoaneurysm CHA | Stent | Died |
| 6 | 71 | F | Ductal adenocarcinoma | No | 23 | Pseudoaneurysm CHA | Stent | Died |
| 7 | 80 | M | Neuroendocrine tumour | Yes | 35 | GDA stump | Coil | Survived |
| 8 | 68 | M | Ductal adenocarcinoma | No | 5 | GDA stump | Coil | Survived |
M, male; F, female; SMA, superior mesenteric artery; CHA, common hepatic artery; GDA, gastroduodenal artery.