Table 2.
Ntest | ΔFd | ΔG (se) | ΔFped(se) | ΔFIBD(se) |
---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
ΔFAconstraint – GBLUP |
||
3000 |
0.005 |
3.08 (0.035) |
0.0050 (0.0001) |
0.0211 (0.0004) |
6000 |
0.005 |
3.10 (0.035) |
0.0048 (0.0001) |
0.0226 (0.0004) |
6000 |
0.010 |
3.31 (0.037) |
0.0098 (0.0003) |
0.0422 (0.0008) |
|
|
ΔFGconstraint – GBLUP |
||
3000 |
0.005 |
1.91 (0.026) |
0.0041 (0.0001) |
0.0051 (0.0001) |
6000 |
0.005 |
1.95 (0.024) |
0.0039 (0.0001) |
0.0053 (0.0001) |
6000 |
0.010 |
2.41 (0.028) |
0.0071 (0.0002) |
0.0102 (0.0002) |
|
|
ΔFAconstraint – TBLUP |
||
3000 |
0.005 |
2.26 (0.003) |
0.0050 (0.0001) |
0.0068 (0.0001) |
6000 |
0.005 |
2.50 (0.003) |
0.0049 (0.0001) |
0.0074 (0.0001) |
6000 |
0.010 |
2.63 (0.003) |
0.0102 (0.0002) |
0.0151 (0.0003) |
|
|
ΔFGconstraint – TBLUP |
||
3000 |
0.005 |
1.41 (0.041) |
0.0193 (0.0004) |
0.0121 (0.0002) |
6000 |
0.005 |
1.44 (0.039) |
0.0185 (0.0004) |
0.0122 (0.0002) |
6000 | 0.010 | 1.48 (0.046) | 0.0300 (0.0008) | 0.0183 (0.0003) |
Genetic gain (ΔG), rate of inbreeding based on pedigree (ΔFped) and on genomic IBD (ΔFIBD) relationship matrices at generation G10 when the constraint on relationship was either pedigree-based (ΔFA) or marker-based (ΔFG) with TBLUP or GBLUP breeding value estimatesa.
aNtest = number of test sibs; ΔFd = desired rates of inbreeding; number of selection candidates = 3000.