Skip to main content
. 2012 Aug 16;44(1):27. doi: 10.1186/1297-9686-44-27

Table 2.

Optimum contribution selection on breeding values estimated using TBLUP or GBLUP

Ntest ΔFd ΔG (se) ΔFped(se) ΔFIBD(se)
 
 
ΔFAconstraint – GBLUP
3000
0.005
3.08 (0.035)
0.0050 (0.0001)
0.0211 (0.0004)
6000
0.005
3.10 (0.035)
0.0048 (0.0001)
0.0226 (0.0004)
6000
0.010
3.31 (0.037)
0.0098 (0.0003)
0.0422 (0.0008)
 
 
ΔFGconstraint – GBLUP
3000
0.005
1.91 (0.026)
0.0041 (0.0001)
0.0051 (0.0001)
6000
0.005
1.95 (0.024)
0.0039 (0.0001)
0.0053 (0.0001)
6000
0.010
2.41 (0.028)
0.0071 (0.0002)
0.0102 (0.0002)
 
 
ΔFAconstraint – TBLUP
3000
0.005
2.26 (0.003)
0.0050 (0.0001)
0.0068 (0.0001)
6000
0.005
2.50 (0.003)
0.0049 (0.0001)
0.0074 (0.0001)
6000
0.010
2.63 (0.003)
0.0102 (0.0002)
0.0151 (0.0003)
 
 
ΔFGconstraint – TBLUP
3000
0.005
1.41 (0.041)
0.0193 (0.0004)
0.0121 (0.0002)
6000
0.005
1.44 (0.039)
0.0185 (0.0004)
0.0122 (0.0002)
6000 0.010 1.48 (0.046) 0.0300 (0.0008) 0.0183 (0.0003)

Genetic gain (ΔG), rate of inbreeding based on pedigree (ΔFped) and on genomic IBD (ΔFIBD) relationship matrices at generation G10 when the constraint on relationship was either pedigree-based (ΔFA) or marker-based (ΔFG) with TBLUP or GBLUP breeding value estimatesa.

aNtest = number of test sibs; ΔFd = desired rates of inbreeding; number of selection candidates = 3000.