Table 2.
Study ID | Was the Study Described as Random? | Was the Randomisation Scheme Described and Appropriate? | Was the Study Described as Being Double-Blind? | Were Both the Patient and Assessor Double Blinded? | Description of Dropouts and Withdrawals? | Total Score (1-5/5) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cannell 2001 [28] | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
Jonsson 2005 [16] | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
Visnes 2005 [25] | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
Young 2005 [24] | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
Bahr 2006 [22] | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
Frohm 2007 [21] | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
Kongsgaard 2009 [23] | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 |