Table 3.
Care Manager Contacts with | Care Manager Time (minutes) on | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Patient | PCP | Family Members | Patient Assessment | Meds Management | Care Coordination | |||||||
|
|
|||||||||||
Mean* | IRR (p- value) |
Mean* | IRR (p- value) |
Mean* | IRR (p- value) |
Mean* | IRR (p- value) |
Mean* | IRR (p- value) |
Mean* | IRR (pvalue) | |
No college vs. some college | ||||||||||||
0-4 mo. | 12.8 | 0.9 (0.581) | 5.7 | 0.8 (0.362) | 1.2 | 0.9 (0.827) | 133 | 0.9 (0.307) | 75 | 0.9 (0.430) | 61 | 0.7 (0.203) |
4-8 mo. | 7.9 | 1.0 (0.872) | 3.0 | 0.7 (0.276) | 0.4 | 1.0 (0.990) | 79 | 1.0 (0.870) | 37 | 1.1 (0.516) | 23 | 1.7 (0.166) |
8-12 mo. | 5.6 | 1.2 (0.295) | 1.1 | 1.5 (0.173) | 0.2 | 1.9 (0.261) | 62 | 1.1 (0.595) | 27 | 1.4 (0.076) | 12 | 1.6 (0.218) |
12-18 mo. | 5.9 | 1.2 (0.423) | 1.1 | 1.3 (0.381) | 0.6 | 0.6 (0.352) | 62 | 1.1 (0.474) | 24 | 1.4 (0.142) | 15 | 1.3 (0.532) |
18-24 mo. | 4.8 | 0.9 (0.583) | 0.8 | 0.9 (0.841) | 0.1 | 3.2 (0.170) | 51 | 1.2 (0.340) | 23 | 1.0 (0.889) | 9 | 1.4 (0.409) |
Minority vs. non-Hispanic white | ||||||||||||
0-4 mo. | 11.7 | 1.1 (0.204) | 5.2 | 0.9 (0.362) | 1.0 | 1.6 (0.158) | 126 | 1.0 (0.698) | 64 | 1.4 (0.030) | 54 | 0.8 (0.198) |
4-8 mo. | 8.2 | 0.8 (0.229) | 2.7 | 0.7 (0.209) | 0.4 | 1.5 (0.340) | 88 | 0.7 (0.076) | 41 | 0.9 (0.685) | 45 | 0.4 (0.019) |
8-12 mo. | 7.2 | 0.6 (0.019) | 1.7 | 0.6 (0.144) | 0.3 | 2.4 (0.079) | 77 | 0.5 (0.002) | 39 | 0.5 (0.010) | 21 | 0.4 (0.028) |
12-18 mo. | 7.1 | 0.7 (0.171) | 1.5 | 0.6 (0.186) | 0.2 | 3.7 (0.014) | 75 | 0.6 (0.065) | 34 | 0.7 (0.211) | 23 | 0.3 (0.008) |
18-24 mo. | 4.6 | 0.9 (0.694) | 0.9 | 0.6 (0.148) | 0.1 | 3.1 (0.034) | 66 | 0.6 (0.167) | 24 | 1.0 (0.900) | 16 | 0.4 (0.032) |
Mean predicted DCM intensity for the reference patient group, i.e., some college for education comparison, non-Hispanic white for ethnic comparison. IRR=Incident Rate Ratio; IRR measures the relative frequency of contacts/ care manager time between an index group and its reference group.
Results are based on longitudinal negative binomial regressions.
Robust standard errors were based on clustering at the patient level.