Table 2. Summary of bottleneck tests implemented in BOTTLENECK and M-RATIO.
| Species | Pop. | BOTTLENECK | M-RATIO | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |
|
IAM |
TPM |
SMM |
θ=0.05 |
θ=0.1 |
θ=0.5 |
| O. ishikawae | SAT | 0.139 | 0.095 | 0.119 | 0.069 | 0.083 | 0.204 |
| AHA | 0.106 | 0.103 | 0.066 | <10–3 | <10–3 | 0.001 | |
| TAI | 0.491 | 0.496 | 0.068 | 0.080 | 0.089 | 0.070 | |
| O. splendida | SED | 0.254 | 0.518 | 0.483 | <10–3 | <10–3 | <10–3 |
| FUM | 0.019 | 0.255 | 0.270 | 0.027 | 0.031 | 0.071 | |
| KAT | 0.448 | 0.074 | 0.140 | <10–3 | <10–3 | 0.036 | |
| NAN | 0.510 | 0.083 | 0.016 | 0.017 | 0.002 | 0.010 | |
For BOTTLENECK, three mutation models were used: infinity allele model (IAM), two-phase mutation model (TPM) and stepwise mutation model (SMM). For M-RATIO, three θ values were used: 0.05, 0.1 and 0.5. Values in bold type indicate statistical significance (P<0.05). ZAT, BEN and BEN-R of O. ishikawae and URA, CHU, SAN, AMI, SHI, KAN and NIS of O. splendida were excluded due to small sample sizes (n<7).