Skip to main content
. 2012 Dec 14;7(12):e52069. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0052069

Table 1. Characteristics of datasets used for comparative metagenomic analysis.

RSM (4440281.3) BSM (4440282.3) POCR (4440039.3) SW (4443702.3) PO (4443713.3) TFS (4446153.3) HAFS (4445417.3) PMS (4451036.3) AHEC (4449206.3)
Number of reads 334,386 388,627 351,205 209,073 221,744 782,404 619,288 217,605 280,753
Average size read (bp) 105±17 99±16 105±17 226±60 239±55 411±103 310±118 222±107 190±95
Total Mbp 35.5 38.5 37.0 47.2 53.0 322.2 192.3 48.5 53.5
Mean GC content (%) 49±12 44±10 46±10 40±9 39±9 59±6 62±7 54±10 52±10
Taxonomy classified reads (%) a 0.0068 0.038 0.021 47.5 55.3 59.4 58.7 33.5 8,7
% KEGG matches b 0.0095 0.055 0.037 19.8 23.1 16.9 19.5 12,0 1,8
% SEED matches b 0.0185 0.108 0.100 47.6 55.7 37.6 43.7 29.0 4.2
Reference [39] [39] [80] [81] Unpublished [82] Unpublished [24] This study

RSM: Red Soudan Mine (acidic); BSM: Black Soudan Mine; POCR: Pacific Ocean (coral reefs); SW: Sea Water; PO: Pacific Ocean; TFS: Tropical Forest Soil; HAFS: High Andean Forest Soil; PMS: Pristine Mangrove Sediments; AHEC: Acidic Hot Spring EC. a Using RefSeq database (Bacteria, Archaea, Eukarya and Virus) (cut-off E-value 1e-10); b cut-off E-value 1 e-10.