Skip to main content
. 2012 Dec 14;7(12):e51263. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0051263

Table 3. Resolutive power of 18SrDNA versus mitochondrial markers.

18S rDNA mitochondrial
Taxonomic group Dataset reference BOLD project name nb of seqs nb of species seq length (bp) nb of sp. sharing a sequence pairwise intrageneric distances in the dataset pairwise intergeneric distances in the dataset Marker name: seq length (bp) nb of sp. sharing a sequence pairwise intrageneric distances in the dataset Pairwise intergeneric distances in the dataset
Lepidoptera [31] LGC 70 68 655 20 0–0.65 0–1.43 COI: 655 0 4.28–12.68 4.59–15.44
Amphibia [30] CBAM 81 14 570 7 0 0–1.09 COI: 655 2 0–20.38 14.97–21.92
Ascidiacea [29] ASCAN 30 22 800 6 0–11.12 0–9.74 COI: 550 0 0.17–34.29 6.53–26.74
Nematoda [33] 15 7 1708 3 0–1.07 0.06–1.13 12S: 499 0 0–12.37 7.5–25.9
Teleostei [32] 160 71 1800 14 0–1.33 0–1.39 12S: 390 0 0–12.56

Only specimens for which both markers were available were included in the comparison. The values are min-max of the pairwise divergences. Intergeneric distances are calculated on specimens belonging to the same family.