Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: Nat Chem. 2012 Oct;4(10):832–839. doi: 10.1038/nchem.1451

Figure 2. Single-labeled-zone fluorescent barcodes.

Figure 2

(a) Superimposed TIRF microscopy images of five barcode species (top) and the statistics from manual counting (bottom). The barcode types are noted under the horizontal axis of the diagram. Each bar-graph is generated by manually counting the objects in a 50 × 50 μm2 image (~40 barcodes, the exact sample size N is noted beside the corresponding bar-graph). (b) A representative image of the equimolar mixture of 27 barcode species. (c) Statistics obtained by analyzing twenty-seven 50 × 50 μm2 images of the 27-barcode mixture (1,485 barcode molecules). Left: counts of the 27 species (55 ± 9; mean ± s.d.). A representative TIRF image (1.4 × 0.7 μm2) of each barcode type is placed underneath the corresponding bar. Right: object sorting result shown as a pie-chart. Color scheme used for the bar-graphs in (a) and the pie-chart in (c): blue, correct barcodes (qualified barcode with expected identity); green, incorrect barcodes (qualified barcode with unexpected identity); red, monomer nanorods (one spot or two touching spots); purple, barcodes with wrong geometry (bending angle <120°, see Methods in SI); orange, barcodes containing at least one spot with two colors. Note that in the 27-barcode pool, correct vs. incorrect barcodes were not distinguishable because all barcode types were expected. As a result, the bars and pie representing the qualified barcodes in (c) are shown in gray. Scale bars: 5 μm.