. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Dec 17.

Published in final edited form as: Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009 Dec 1;34(25):2797–2802. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181a9e640

Table 5.

Intercorrelations and variance explained (R²) for Satisfaction, and Patient’s reported Average pain, Physical function and Goal Achievement at least 1 year after completing the FRP

				Goal Achievement
	Satisfaction N = 86	Avg. Pain N = 86	PF N = 86	Work N = 84	Recreation N = 77	Home N = 72	Composite N = 86
Satisfaction	1.00	−0.530	0.547	0.364	0.509	0.554	0.542
Average Pain	0.281	1.00	−0.607	−0.432	−0.411	−0.408	−0.460
PF	0.299		1.00	0.279	0.512	0.525	0.406
GA: Work	0.132			1.00	0.552	0.372	0.824
GA: Recreation	0.259				1.00	0.690	0.885
GA: Home	0.307					1.00	0.807
GA: Composite	0.293	0.299	0.132	0.259	0.307	0.294	1.00

Pearson Correlations between variables are above the diagonal.

All correlations in the table were statistically significant at p < .05

Bolded scores in the Satisfaction column are the simple regression R² values