Skip to main content
. 2012 Jan;6(1):45–57. doi: 10.12816/0005972

Table 3.

Impact of various factors on prevalence of waterpipe smoking among university students in Qassim region.

Characteristics Groups No. Waterpipe smokers Unadjusted or (95%CI) Adjusted or (95% CI)
No. %
Marital Status Single 251 77 15.4 1 1
Married 189 100 20 2.34 (1.61–3.29)* 1.01 (0.78–1.30)*
College Health College 60 24 4.8 0.55 (0.40–0.75) 2.84 (2.07–3.90)
Science College 25 13 2.6 1 1
Literature College 475 188 37.6 0.78 (0.45–1.37) 0.92 (0.53–1.62)
Living Area Big City 291 116 23.3 1 1
Small city 187 79 15.8 1.95 (0.73–1.23) 0.19 (0.77–1.29)
Rural Area 22 6 1.2 1.01 (0.55–1.87) 1.00 (0.55–1.83)
Year of Study First 133 56 11.2 1 1
Second 107 45 9 0.95 (0.70–1.30) 0.99 (0.74–1.35)
Advance 260 100 20 0.92 (0.71–1.18) 0.99 (0.78–1.28)
Overall GPA Excellent 182 69 13.8 1 1
Very good 185 69 13.8 0.84 (0.65–1.10) 0.97 (0.75–1.26)
Good 22 14 2.8 1.35 (0.74–2.48)* 1.002 (0.55–1.83)*
Fair or excepted 111 49 9.8 1.00 (0.76–1.33) 2.01 (1.52–2.65)
Yearly income <15000 364 146 29.2 1 1
15000–35000 92 32 6.4 1.07 (0.77–1.47) 1.005 (0.73–1.47)
35001–55000 14 8 1.6 1.71 (0.80–3.64) 1.00 (0.47–2.13)
>55000 30 15 3 1.03 (0.60–1.75) 1.04 (0.61–1.80)
Cigarette smoking No 295 228 45.6 1 1
Yes 205 134 26.8 6.42 (4.32–9.54)* 6.87 (4.85–8.49)*
Waterpipe smoking among family members No 68 52 10.4 1 1
Yes 432 185 37 2.43 (1.35–4.40)* 1.91 (1.28–2.85)*
Waterpipe smoking among friends No 87 72 14.4 1 1
Yes 413 186 37.2 4.85 (3.13–7.52)* 3.93 (2.18–7.09)*
*

P<0.05