Skip to main content
. 2012 Nov 14;109(49):20095–20100. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1213390109

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5.

A schematic depicting the reconstruction of individual stimulus–behavior lags (C) from stimulus–brain lags (A) and brain–behavior lags (B). For each listener, stimulus–brain lags were estimated from a cross-correlation analysis, whereas stimulus–behavior and brain–behavior relations were taken from analyses estimating optimal phase from hit rate data. Then, brain–behavior lags and stimulus–brain lags in radians were summed, and this sum was correlated with stimulus–behavior lags (P = 0.03). This relationship confirmed that variability in stimulus–behavior relations is well explained by the intervening brain oscillation phase lag.