Skip to main content
. 2011 Oct 5;39(1):186–196. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbr125

Table 2.

Correlations Among the Social Cognitive Measures and the Negative Symptom Measures*

Pearson Correlation Coefficients PANSS Negative SANS Flattening/Blunting SANS Alogia SANS Avolition/Apathy SANS Anhedonia/Asociality SAT-MC BLERT Hinting BORRTI Egocentricity MSCEIT-ME
PANSS negative 1
SANS Flattening/ blunting 0.810** 1
SANS alogia 0.611** 0.564** 1
SANS Avolition/ apathy 0.492** 0.401** 0.214* 1
SANS Anhedonia/ asociality 0.530** 0.304* 0.254* 0.435** 1
+SAT-MC 0.041 −0.104 −0.053 0.076 0.249* 1
+BLERT 0.078 0.028 −0.040 0.136 −0.040 0.344** 1
+Hinting −0.204* −0.207* −0.267* −0.096 −0.121 0.140 0.207* 1
BORRTTI  egocentricity −0.085 −0.073 0.078 −0.004 .074 −0.162 −0.406** 0.000 1
+MSCEIT-ME −0.03 −0.07 0.002 −0.021 −.141 0.298** 0.360** 0.222* −0.276* 1

Note: PANSS Negative, Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale, negative component score; SANS, Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms; SAT-MC, Social Attribution Task—Multiple Choice, correct score; BLERT, Bell Lysaker Emotion Recognition Test, correct score; Hinting, The Hinting Task, total score; BORRTI Egocentricity, Bell Object Relations Reality Testing Inventory, Egocentricity subscale; MSCEIT-ME, Mayer-Salovey-Caruso Emotional Intelligence Test—Managing Emotions Branch. + Higher scores represent better performance.

**

Correlation is significant at the .01 level (2 tailed).

*

Correlation is significant at the .05 level (2 tailed).