. 2012 Nov 14;5:262. doi: 10.1186/1756-3305-5-262

Table 3.

Gravidity rate of Anopheles gambiae s.l. observed before and after IRS and LLIN intervention in districts of Adjohoun, Dangbo, Misserete and Seme

Districts	Before intervention (May-July 2008)				After intervention (May-July 2009)
	Number of females caught	Number of gravid mosquitoes	Gravidity rate		Number of females caught	Number of gravid mosquitoes	Gravidity rate
			Mean	Confidence interval			Mean	Confidence interval
IRS arm
Adjohoun	84	26	30.16^a	[21.31-41.98]	32	0	0^b	[0.00-10.91]
Dangbo	84	31	36^a	[26.63-48.13]	48	0	0^b	[0.00-7.42]
Misserete ₁	84	29	33.66^a	[24.48-45.70]	5	0	0^b	[0.00-52.20]
Misserete ₂	288	120	41.16^a	[35.91-47.60]	4	0	0^b	[0.00-60.25]
Seme	388	142	36.16^a	[31.79-41.61]	0	-	-	-
Akron Control	88	35	41^a	[29.49-50.77]	132	53	40^a	[31.72-49.04]
LLITN arm
Adjohoun	91	41	44.33^a	[34.60-55.85]	72	22	30.55^b	[20.24-42.53]
Dangbo	82	38	46.66^a	[35.25-57.70]	100	35	35^b	[25.73-45.19]
Seme	90	35	38.66^a	[28.79-49.75]	216	101	48.33^a	[39.96-53.65]
Akron Control	404	176	42.33^a	[38.67-48.56]	384	133	36.33^a	[29.88-39.63]

For the mean of each district, values of the same line which carry same letters in exposant were not significantly different (p > 0.05).